Poll

GOAT

L. Messi
C. Ronaldo

Author Topic: Still not worthy of a thread  (Read 897098 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pixelphish

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16925 on: Monday 29 June 2020, 03:31:11 PM »

Imagine my shock he's an ignorant gammon.

Spoiler
[close]

Aye. Just felt I did it at the same time as you and you came out tops every time. Just in a bad mood now after Pixelhax.

Have to get this out now:

Pixel you're either hacking with the demo, or you're too f***ing good to constantly hammer us to the ground with it every time we play. Starts to take the p*ss a bit. I mean, I don't want you to not enjoy the game, but at the same time I'd quite like to enjoy playing it too.

Offline Sho'Time

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16926 on: Monday 29 June 2020, 03:49:24 PM »
He started off right saying if you're far left or far right to f*** off. Both absolute spackers either way. Coming out with "I'm reviewing" though :lol: weirdo.

Online Judge Holden

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16927 on: Monday 29 June 2020, 09:40:07 PM »
Andre Wisdom in hospital after being stabbed.

Offline M4

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16928 on: Monday 29 June 2020, 10:43:29 PM »
Laurent Robert on Instagram is the best thing to come out of lockdown along with Andrew Cotter and his dogs.

He's been class. The man knows how to live :lol:
"He can still tell you every single goal... and his training goals he counts as well. Apparently he's got 6,000 goals."

Offline Nobody

  • Moderator
  • That chick was like the Pele of anal
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16929 on: Monday 29 June 2020, 11:46:12 PM »
?s=20

Anybody read this? I haven't but apparently it basically outlines he wasn't that good.

Now I don't mind these kind of things when someone scores 1 unbelievable or important goal and it colours people's perception into being that the player had a great game but surely when you score 4 goals in a game its completely ridiculous to try to say he didn't play that well? :lol:
That's not what it says at all, it actually says he was really good that day, despite Arsenal playing on the counter attack limiting his opportunities to influence the general play. Really good read IMO.

Offline OCK

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16930 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 12:02:28 AM »

I signed him on FM once because he was a Newcastle fan. He was s**** and wish I had had a save before I signed him.

Offline Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16931 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 04:45:29 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:
?s=21

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16932 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 08:27:13 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.

Edit:  It was still the first division, wasn't it? how long did that last?

Online Greg

  • Moderator
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16933 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 08:33:20 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16934 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 08:41:34 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

I was sure it was only the 1st division for two years at most.

Online neesy111

  • General Member
  • Madrid, ES
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16935 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 08:42:44 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

Classic Greg this. :lol:

Online loki679

  • General Member
  • 中国
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16936 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 09:19:36 AM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

Classic Gregg this. :lol:
Comfy chairs, beer, and doom. Humanity's future is an early 90s LAN party.

Online Butcher

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16937 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 09:22:53 AM »
Pardew’s 8 year deal expires today :lol:

Offline LoveItIfWeBeatU

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16938 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 12:43:57 PM »
I see Aleksandar Mitrovic got himself a 3 game ban for a deliberate elbow. I'm sure Fulham will be livid with him as that puts a dent in their promotion hopes.
Thier is not a word. "Their" is the correct spelling.

Win, Lose or Draw. NOT "Loose"!

Online neesy111

  • General Member
  • Madrid, ES
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16939 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 12:57:36 PM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

Classic Gregg this. :lol:

@Greg

Offline Infinitely Content

  • General Member
  • Life imitates art
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16940 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 01:10:08 PM »
?s=20

Anybody read this? I haven't but apparently it basically outlines he wasn't that good.

Now I don't mind these kind of things when someone scores 1 unbelievable or important goal and it colours people's perception into being that the player had a great game but surely when you score 4 goals in a game its completely ridiculous to try to say he didn't play that well? :lol:
That's not what it says at all, it actually says he was really good that day, despite Arsenal playing on the counter attack limiting his opportunities to influence the general play. Really good read IMO.

Not read it but guessing it's this f***ing dull revisionism that goes on these days with these new fancy stats and data charts as if they're supposed to override what we see and feel when watching a player/team perform. It's so f***ing boring. Read one the other day that said Saint-Maximin isn't actually good it's just relative to his team mates based on stats... :rolleyes:

Arshavin was fantastic. As was Rosicky.

Online Greg

  • Moderator
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16941 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 01:17:32 PM »
Remember signing him on the season we were in The Championship first time around and he was class for me. :lol:

Christ the lad must be some age if he was playing in 92-93.


Only been the Championship since 2004 tbh.

Classic Gregg this. :lol:

@Greg

I'm over it / immune.

Offline St1pe

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16942 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 01:41:32 PM »
?s=21

Laughed way too hard at some of these.

Offline Dokko

  • TT
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16943 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 03:17:08 PM »
?s=21

Laughed way too hard at some of these.

That’s brill. Seems Bruce wins. Pullis one is the best  :lol:

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16944 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 11:16:07 PM »
?s=21

Offline chopey

  • General Member
  • Co Durham, England.
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16945 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 11:24:05 PM »
I'm pleased they got WC bonus and special bonus cos the annual bonus is s***.
Mike Ashley stole my 30's

Offline Nobody

  • Moderator
  • That chick was like the Pele of anal
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16946 on: Tuesday 30 June 2020, 11:27:46 PM »
?s=20

Anybody read this? I haven't but apparently it basically outlines he wasn't that good.

Now I don't mind these kind of things when someone scores 1 unbelievable or important goal and it colours people's perception into being that the player had a great game but surely when you score 4 goals in a game its completely ridiculous to try to say he didn't play that well? :lol:
That's not what it says at all, it actually says he was really good that day, despite Arsenal playing on the counter attack limiting his opportunities to influence the general play. Really good read IMO.

Not read it but guessing it's this f***ing dull revisionism that goes on these days with these new fancy stats and data charts as if they're supposed to override what we see and feel when watching a player/team perform. It's so f***ing boring. Read one the other day that said Saint-Maximin isn't actually good it's just relative to his team mates based on stats... :rolleyes:

Arshavin was fantastic. As was Rosicky.
It's not actually :lol: It focuses a lot more on when he was good, his decline for Arsenal is left to the end of the article.

Offline La Parka

  • Not Leeds Mag
  • General Member
  • Up the rail!
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16947 on: Wednesday 1 July 2020, 07:47:09 AM »
?s=21

Laughed way too hard at some of these.

That’s brill. Seems Bruce wins. Pullis one is the best  :lol:

Loved Farkes entry seems legit.

Offline Dokko

  • TT
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16948 on: Wednesday 1 July 2020, 12:31:35 PM »
Wigan call in administrators

Offline Big Geordie

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #16949 on: Wednesday 1 July 2020, 12:32:48 PM »
Wigan call in administrators

Won't be the last, IMO.
The truth points to itself