Poll

GOAT

L. Messi
C. Ronaldo

Author Topic: Still not worthy of a thread  (Read 814188 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15800 on: Wednesday 12 February 2020, 08:35:31 PM »
Think I remember an oppositon player putting the ball out for a corner rather than a throw in once to avoid the Delap long throw.

It's weird that it was only late in his career that a manager realised Delap had such a long throw. Sure he was a junior javelin record holder or something. I read he gets really annoyed that he made like 400 career appearances but all he's remembered for is his long throw

I remember Aaron Hughes doing similar in a cup game down at Tranmere when they had Challinor. He was down near the corner being pressured and he was going to put it out for a throw, but played a risky backpass instead. :lol:
?s=21

Offline BlueStar

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15801 on: Wednesday 12 February 2020, 11:08:38 PM »
?s=08

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15802 on: Wednesday 12 February 2020, 11:25:55 PM »
?s=08

Rip off


Online cubaricho

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15803 on: Wednesday 12 February 2020, 11:49:31 PM »
Absolutely loving this Peter Crouch podcast. Such a cool peek behind the curtains.
▒▓██ N █ U █ F █ C ██▓▒

Offline Astroblack

  • mkdisciple
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15804 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 11:43:58 AM »
Absolutely loving this Peter Crouch podcast. Such a cool peek behind the curtains.

Oh man I love it too. At first I didn’t like one of his co hosts, the Watford fan but he’s grown on me a little bit. Can’t believe they did a Crouch fest and (I think) sold out the 02. I really wish they just strictly covered his Liverpool career honestly. Then we can get some Rafa insight. That’s all I want tbh. I’ll be honest, sometimes I don’t like when he said that he retired because he thought he was becoming a gimmick player. He should have embraced it for as long as he could. I mean he had a long career but maybe he could have played longer.

This is a really random thought but I don’t know why James Ward Prowse is still at Southampton. It’s so obvious he’s going to be one of those hard working pro type players. I really hope he doesn’t go to City and become a squad player. I think he could be Ander Herrera esque at Man Utd. I hope he starts his entire career. He’s good enough. Stupid James Milner went to City and sat on the bench. Yeah he won trophies but he spent some prime years sitting on the bench. I think I looked this up but he never started any of their final victories(did come on as a sub when they lost to Wigan) i mean Gareth Barry was starting over him in that City midfield. Gareth Barry?!? I don’t know. 

Online Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15805 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 04:43:43 PM »
Bobby Madley returning to English football next season.
?s=21

Offline Ian W

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15806 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 04:47:04 PM »
Bobby Madley returning to English football next season.

Where's he been again?

Online neesy111

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15807 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 04:49:25 PM »

Offline tgarve

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15808 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 05:01:51 PM »
Bobby Madley returning to English football next season.

Where's he been again?

Kennels?
Follow me on twitter @tgarve

Online Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15809 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 05:24:52 PM »
A dog joke. How amusing.
?s=21

Offline tgarve

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15810 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 05:26:03 PM »
A dog joke. How amusing.

Apologies, going through a rough patch , il let you take the lead next time.
Follow me on twitter @tgarve

Online Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15811 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 05:28:08 PM »
A woof patch surely.
?s=21

Offline 54

  • NUFC54
  • General Member
  • Remember...
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15812 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 06:23:01 PM »

Offline Ian W

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15813 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 06:30:36 PM »
Obviously :lol:

Offline xLiaaamx

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15814 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 08:41:48 PM »
On another note, I'm not surprised some teams are shown to not really defend at all  :lol:

Online Ketsbaia

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15815 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 09:26:40 PM »
I love how Liverpool and Man City defend most in their attacking third.

Offline HTT

  • tl;dr
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15816 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 09:30:07 PM »
I love how Liverpool and Man City defend most in their attacking third.

KK - best form of defence is attack/defend from front. Rafa similar, only we had to do that a lot off the ball under him.

It would be interesting to see a comparison graph after we signed Almiron...
Wee Hughie - the greatest centre-forward Newcastle United ever had

Online WarrenBartonCentrePartin

  • Boring James Milner
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15817 on: Thursday 13 February 2020, 11:43:35 PM »
A dog joke. How amusing.

Apologies, going through a rough patch , il let you take the lead next time.

Saw this then had to paws for thought. What division is he going into? Surely he would't get a sniff in the PL - or am I barking up the wrong tree?
Had a few dances off her when I've been in Blue velvet with friends. She's one of the ones who will push her fanny in your face, usually I like that but hers smells f***ing rotten. Only had dances off her because she agreed to take less money for the dances when me and my mate said we were skint.

I was a pure creep when I was a kid tbf. Used to spunk in deoderant can lids too

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15818 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 07:35:40 AM »
?s=21

All three stonewallers! I loved that lunatic (as a player!)!

Offline Ian W

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15819 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 01:16:42 PM »
:lol:

Not sure I knew that happened. Amazing character.

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15820 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 02:30:48 PM »
:lol:

Not sure I knew that happened. Amazing character.

The same match!


Online Greg

  • Moderator
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15821 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 06:33:56 PM »
?s=20

Offline Froggy

  • Ok at Rocket League
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15822 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 06:34:04 PM »
City apparently banned from CL for two years.

Offline xLiaaamx

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15823 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 06:35:38 PM »
CAS will overturn that straight away. They always do.

Online Greg

  • Moderator
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #15824 on: Friday 14 February 2020, 06:39:39 PM »
Man City statement

"Manchester City is disappointed but not surprised by today’s announcement by the UEFA Adjudicatory Chamber. The Club has always anticipated the ultimate need to seek out an independent body and process to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence in support of its position.
In December 2018, the UEFA Chief Investigator publicly previewed the outcome and sanction he intended to be delivered to Manchester City, before any investigation had even begun. The subsequent flawed and consistently leaked UEFA process he oversaw has meant that there was little doubt in the result that he would deliver.  The Club has formally complained to the UEFA Disciplinary body, a complaint which was validated by a CAS ruling. 

Simply put, this is a case initiated by UEFA, prosecuted by UEFA and judged by UEFA. With this prejudicial process now over, the Club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity."