Poll

GOAT

L. Messi
C. Ronaldo

Author Topic: Still not worthy of a thread  (Read 767176 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HTT

  • tl;dr
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13100 on: Wednesday 20 March 2019, 08:30:48 PM »
How good was Domi? Too young to remember

Could have been one of the best left-backs in the Premier League because he had it all and when he did perform, he looked genuinely like a top player. He was weak mentally though and didn’t seem to settle. I think he had fitness problems a well. Bernad was the best left-back we’ve had in our PL era for me, although Distin despite being a CB and at the club a short time on loan, was immense when played LB. I thought we lost out big time when he didn’t sign and went on to prove himself a very good CB.
Wee Hughie - the greatest centre-forward Newcastle United ever had

Offline Sima

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13101 on: Wednesday 20 March 2019, 10:24:51 PM »
How good was Domi? Too young to remember

Could have been one of the best left-backs in the Premier League because he had it all and when he did perform, he looked genuinely like a top player. He was weak mentally though and didn’t seem to settle. I think he had fitness problems a well. Bernad was the best left-back we’ve had in our PL era for me, although Distin despite being a CB and at the club a short time on loan, was immense when played LB. I thought we lost out big time when he didn’t sign and went on to prove himself a very good CB.

Beresford imo.

Offline tgarve

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13102 on: Wednesday 20 March 2019, 10:25:38 PM »
How good was Domi? Too young to remember

Could have been one of the best left-backs in the Premier League because he had it all and when he did perform, he looked genuinely like a top player. He was weak mentally though and didn’t seem to settle. I think he had fitness problems a well. Bernad was the best left-back we’ve had in our PL era for me, although Distin despite being a CB and at the club a short time on loan, was immense when played LB. I thought we lost out big time when he didn’t sign and went on to prove himself a very good CB.

Beresford imo.

Enrique for me
Follow me on twitter @tgarve

Offline jdckelly

  • Book Wanker
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13103 on: Wednesday 20 March 2019, 10:36:22 PM »
SSN reporter Fraser Robertson has passed away.
jeez only 47 way too young.

RIP

Offline leffe186

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13104 on: Wednesday 20 March 2019, 10:38:32 PM »
?s=19

                              Lloris

           Aldeweireld    King    Vertonghen

Carr                                                        Bale

                    Modric       Eriksen

         Son                                      Ginola

                            Kane       

Seems legit.
Obviously, I'm speaking of a hypothetical world in which there is a greater club than Tottenham.

Offline HTT

  • tl;dr
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13105 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 02:46:39 AM »
How good was Domi? Too young to remember

Could have been one of the best left-backs in the Premier League because he had it all and when he did perform, he looked genuinely like a top player. He was weak mentally though and didn’t seem to settle. I think he had fitness problems a well. Bernad was the best left-back we’ve had in our PL era for me, although Distin despite being a CB and at the club a short time on loan, was immense when played LB. I thought we lost out big time when he didn’t sign and went on to prove himself a very good CB.

Beresford imo.

It was a close race between the two because Beresford was such a good player for us, and an underrated one as well IMO. But overall as a footballer Bernard just edges it for me. That performance away to Inter for example was colossal and a performance I don’t think Beresford ever had in him, mind Bramble was magnificent that game too. Most of the team were. We’ve actually had some very good left-backs, but all of them you could argue had a few question marks against them. Right-back there are not many to pick from, you’d be looking at Watson or even Venison, but I’d pick a prime Beye if we are talking about their all-round game and football ability even though he wasn’t at the club very long. I though Barton despite a few outstanding games showing real class, just wasn’t in the same class ability wise as some of the others nor as effective going forward. He probably played some of his better football for us towards the end of his career under Sir Bobby where he was more Dummett like than anything else, steady, nothing fancy, job done. Robbie Elliott could have been something special but for injuries and it’s a shame we got Pearce at the very end of his career, even though his brief spell wasn’t too bad. I’m sure he played in the entire of defence for us s few times as well?
Wee Hughie - the greatest centre-forward Newcastle United ever had

Offline Raconteur

  • General Member
  • I don't see any method at all, sir
Steve Bruce: Ashley Enabler.

"I have heard lots of nonsense about tactics but the big thing is about showing pride and having a go." 29/09/19

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13107 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 05:29:21 AM »
Scandalous!

?s=21

Offline nemtizz

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13108 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 06:32:16 AM »
"That's awful. Let's do the same exact thing!"

Offline Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13109 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 09:11:30 AM »
Wasn't around so could have been but Ferguson better than Perez/Rondon for NUFC?

When he played, easily. He just didn't play enough.

I used to love our kick-offs under Sir Bobby second half of the 99/00 season. Shearer, Ferguson and Speed would all stand on the left wing and it involved normally Solano floating a ball from centre towards that side about 30 yards from the byline for one of them to win an aerial tussle. :lol:
?s=21

Offline neesy111

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13110 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 09:42:30 AM »
Ferguson's goal vs Man utd. :drool:

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13111 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 12:19:45 PM »

firetotheworks

  • Guest
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13112 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 12:48:41 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-47650835

Not to be all Daily Mail about it, but it really is disgraceful that they're getting a combined 17 years or so for selling illegal football streams, when you consider the paltry sentences you see banded about for things like drunk drive sentences where someone's died as a result.

Offline Divun Naa

  • New Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13113 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 01:18:37 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-47650835

Not to be all Daily Mail about it, but it really is disgraceful that they're getting a combined 17 years or so for selling illegal football streams, when you consider the paltry sentences you see banded about for things like drunk drive sentences where someone's died as a result.
Completely agree with you but I suspect the high sentence is due to the fact that they are a small group of inidividuals versus a rich global corporation in todays definitely no so skewed society.
Rain is only a problem if you don't like getting wet.

Offline Bizza

  • General Member
  • Darlington FC, Newcastle United
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13114 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 01:27:19 PM »
?s=19

Offline leffe186

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13115 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 01:59:11 PM »
How can they play football with all that racket going on?
Obviously, I'm speaking of a hypothetical world in which there is a greater club than Tottenham.

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13116 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 07:18:07 PM »
I knew it was an unreal ball at the time but it looks even better from this angle!

?s=21

Offline Mr Logic

  • Lord of the pikeys
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13117 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 08:36:17 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-47650835

Not to be all Daily Mail about it, but it really is disgraceful that they're getting a combined 17 years or so for selling illegal football streams, when you consider the paltry sentences you see banded about for things like drunk drive sentences where someone's died as a result.
Completely agree with you but I suspect the high sentence is due to the fact that they are a small group of inidividuals versus a rich global corporation in todays definitely no so skewed society.

Your honour, under the rules of capitalism we have gained a near monopoly on incoming revenues from broadcasting football matches. These (enterprising) little scrotes, sorry your honour, three individuals, have managed to tap into the market and gain less than 1% of our yearly revenue/profit stream. Monies which I am sure your honour will agree rightly belonged to us.

The judge criticising the pubs as profoundly dishonest probably doesn't have a clue how much they are charged for licences. That IS piracy, the prices they charge.

Why don't Sky explain that unless you are wealthy enough to afford to watch football you'll just have to go without. Poor people are simply denied access to what used to be the working mans sport.
And they have the nerve to call it piracy. Whole thing is a joke. The entire system of courts and fines is taken from Maritime Law from centuries ago and is just a way of the accepted big fish chewing up any small fish that try to grow.

Broadcast all the matches of every team and set a subscription. They'd make more money and the crowds at games will not diminish by more than 5% is my guess.

A life spent in fear is a life half lived.

firetotheworks

  • Guest
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13118 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 08:44:40 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-47650835

Not to be all Daily Mail about it, but it really is disgraceful that they're getting a combined 17 years or so for selling illegal football streams, when you consider the paltry sentences you see banded about for things like drunk drive sentences where someone's died as a result.
Completely agree with you but I suspect the high sentence is due to the fact that they are a small group of inidividuals versus a rich global corporation in todays definitely no so skewed society.

:lol: :thup:

Offline Stifleaay

  • Heavy scarer of dogs
  • General Member
  • Come here you ginger bitch.
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13119 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 10:29:27 PM »
You know what, it would be so easy for Sky and the Premier League to all away games to be broadcast in the local area to the away teams. Make it so only pubs can show the games, then away fans have to go there to see it. You’ll soon see internet streams disappear, pubs will get the fans in and sell pints, thus saving them, and at the end of the day they will make more money from selling steaming services to many pubs for a small fee then they will to only some pubs for a large fee.

Offline Pilko

  • General Member
  • Bunsen burner
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13120 on: Thursday 21 March 2019, 11:10:17 PM »
Nah
"Does a struggling salesman start turning up on a bicycle? No, he turns up in a newer car. Perception." - David Brent

Offline Paully

  • General Member


Offline TBG

  • King of GIF. WHAT?
  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13123 on: Friday 22 March 2019, 07:18:27 AM »
I knew it was an unreal ball at the time but it looks even better from this angle!

?s=21

Sliced it.

Offline Sima

  • General Member
Re: Still not worthy of a thread
« Reply #13124 on: Friday 22 March 2019, 09:20:28 AM »
s**** Lejuene.