Author Topic: St. James' Park  (Read 1176932 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chopey

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12125 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 11:25:58 AM »
Each to their own and all that......... But how the f*** can you actively support that mess and call yourself a Newcastle United fan, probably have a blue and red away shirt next season.
Mike Ashley stole my 30's

Offline NEEJ

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12126 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 11:29:27 AM »
?s=21

The ‘new’ tunnel area lasted all of 3 games.

Looks like the entrance to a Magaluf bar 🤢
f***ing HELL. :lol:

Offline chopey

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12127 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 12:20:49 PM »
?s=20
Mike Ashley stole my 30's

Offline ToonArmy1892

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12128 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 12:46:37 PM »
Those still going have paid for that, well done.

Offline Disco

  • Moderator
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12129 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 12:48:17 PM »
Looks class that.

Offline covmag

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12130 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 12:50:02 PM »
Cheers Mike, you c***
Ashley has killed my club

Offline Fugazi

  • General Member
  • NE28
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12131 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 01:06:44 PM »
Looks class that.

A subtle, classy touch
Consider winning

Offline Optimistic Nut

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12132 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 02:43:35 PM »
Was just thinking before the Brighton game that they’ve done a decent job with the players’ tunnel....then they throw those up. Unbelievable.
?s=21

Offline Decky

  • General Member
  • ashleyout.com
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12133 on: Saturday 28 September 2019, 08:23:17 PM »
Those still going have paid for that, well done.

This.
Steve Bruce, liar, s*** manager and general prick.

Offline nufcjb

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12134 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:01:40 PM »
?s=21

The ‘new’ tunnel area lasted all of 3 games.

Looks like the entrance to a Magaluf bar 🤢
Have they removed it?

Offline LV

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12135 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:04:05 PM »
May as well have just pasted up a poster of Ashley sticking two fingers up because that’s essentially what that tunnel is now.

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12136 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:08:07 PM »
Giant fluorescent stars (in orange, pink and green) are effective, and look less tacky.

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12137 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:09:05 PM »
Any away fans, from London, will wander in there thinking it's a sauna.

Offline LV

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12138 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:39:35 PM »
Giant fluorescent stars (in orange, pink and green) are effective, and look less tacky.

:lol:

Hopefully they are up in the club restaurant. ‘Sausage and chips £1.95’ ‘Bread and butter 80p’

Offline morla84

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12139 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 01:55:37 PM »
Its almost like stuff like this is planned to gain most dramatic effect. Make a half decent job of doing the tunnel up with no SD signs, get a minor bit of approval and then a few games into the season whack that monstrosity up. If anyone ever does take us over they should hold an open day, distribute a number of crow bars and let everyone go to town on them

Offline ToonArmy1892

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12140 on: Sunday 29 September 2019, 02:33:37 PM »
Giant fluorescent stars (in orange, pink and green) are effective, and look less tacky.

:lol:

Hopefully they are up in the club restaurant. ‘Sausage and chips £1.95’ ‘Bread and butter 80p’

 :lol:

Offline Paully

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12141 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 05:31:27 PM »
Absolutely disgusting if this happens

?s=21

Offline morla84

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12142 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 06:01:15 PM »
Great objection letter from a solicitor employed by nust
https://t.co/DQBsvN0dOe?amp=1

Offline Stifleaay

  • Heavy scarer of dogs
  • General Member
  • Come here you ginger bitch.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12143 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 06:15:13 PM »
Great objection letter from a solicitor employed by nust
https://t.co/DQBsvN0dOe?amp=1
It’s pretty much unheard of for an objector to bring in a lawyer to write an objection letter. This should mean that there is a legal reason to prevent the development from happening.

Offline Wolfcastle

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12144 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 07:23:24 PM »
Definitive proof the owner doesn't have the clubs best interests at heart - yet another example of Ashley benefiting to the exact same tune that club is damaged.
Really think its over if this happens. It kills the only thing we have - potential. Then its just sit and wait for all these clubs to get their acts together, grow and pass us.  If you know the club cant move forward it defeats the point of being a supporter.
It'd be so hurtful, so self-sabotaging I'd have no choice but to completely give up on it.

Offline Yorkie

  • General Member
  • C'mTA
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12145 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 08:07:40 PM »
Hasn't the land already been sold? Nowt to do with Ashley from here on in.

Offline Greg

  • Moderator
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12146 on: Friday 11 October 2019, 10:14:27 PM »
Hasn't the land already been sold? Nowt to do with Ashley from here on in.

No. Still with Michael Murray - when I met with the developers they refused to answer my question if their sale reported in the press was subject to them getting this planning consent or not.

Also understand the the new developer is struggling to raise the finance required for the scheme from the banks - but that is hearsay / rumour.

Hopefully we can frustrate and delay as much as possible. The objection is strong, but it is still most likely to be approved.

Offline Thomson Mouse

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12147 on: Yesterday at 10:19:23 AM »
?s=21
People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people.

Offline LV

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12148 on: Yesterday at 11:47:19 AM »
Nice work TM

Get on it kids!