Author Topic: WikiLeaks  (Read 23980 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #50 on: Wednesday 1 December 2010, 07:26:04 pm »
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline indi

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Death to David Pleat.
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #51 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 07:13:21 pm »
So what are the chances of the Canadian and the Yank getting brought up on charges of incitement to murder?

Probably roughly the same as Sarah Palin understanding the word "treason".

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #52 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 07:16:32 pm »
Shows how little confidence the PTB have of themselves in America, getting hysterical about a few diplomcatic gaffs and a lot of intelligence most of us had already guessed at.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #53 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 10:52:09 pm »
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline hakka

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #54 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 10:56:03 pm »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?

May be true, but wouldn't surprise me if this is a smear attempt for bringing the man down for embarrassing the yanks.

Offline Incognito

  • General Member
  • Get your hands off me you freak
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #55 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 11:42:11 pm »
RIP gejon/cajun/ Jon Lockwood.

Proud to have made your acquaintance Sir.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #56 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 11:49:32 pm »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?


As my dear old nan would say,"Oooh,he looks like a rapist doesn't he?"

:lol: Must be a characteristic trait of old women. Seen it loads with old yins in my family!
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline madras

  • Philosoraptor
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #57 on: Thursday 2 December 2010, 11:58:57 pm »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?


As my dear old nan would say,"Oooh,he looks like a rapist doesn't he?"

:lol: Must be a characteristic trait of old women. Seen it loads with old yins in my family!
think about what you've posted GM...think about it.
Bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all.

Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #58 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 12:52:20 am »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?


As my dear old nan would say,"Oooh,he looks like a rapist doesn't he?"

:lol: Must be a characteristic trait of old women. Seen it loads with old yins in my family!
think about what you've posted GM...think about it.

Nope. :dontknow: You'll have to spell it out for me.
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline Adam^

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #59 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 01:31:24 am »
Stuff critising the army in helmand, no s*** they cant secure the region on their own we dont have a stupidly large armed forces unlike the yanks.

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #60 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 07:17:16 am »
Can see them scuttling around Whitehall.."We need to get something on this c***...Ideas anyone?!!111

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #61 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 07:20:34 am »
How propaganda is disseminated: WikiLeaks Edition
By Glenn Greenwald

    *

How propaganda is disseminated: WikiLeaks Edition
AP
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

This is how the U.S. government and American media jointly disseminate propaganda: in the immediate wake of some newsworthy War on Terror event, U.S. Government officials (usually anonymous) make wild and reckless -- though unverifiable -- claims. The U.S. media mindlessly trumpets them around the world without question or challenge. Those claims become consecrated as widely accepted fact. And then weeks, months or years later, those claims get quietly exposed as being utter falsehoods, by which point it does not matter, because the goal is already well-achieved: the falsehoods are ingrained as accepted truth.

I've documented how this process works in the context of American air attacks (it's immediately celebrated that we Killed the Evil Targeted Terrorist Leader [who invariably turns out to be alive and then allegedly killed again in the next air strike], while the dead are always, by definition, "militants"); with covered-up American war crimes, with the Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman frauds -- the same process was also evident with the Israeli attack on the flotilla -- and now we find a quite vivid illustration of this deceitful process in the context of WikiLeaks' release of Afghanistan war documents:

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #62 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 07:24:43 am »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?

When he was in Sweden he offered to help with inquiries voluntarily it turns out and they didn't seem that interested till now...strange.


An arrest warrant for Assange has been issued by the International Public Prosecution Office in Gothenburg. On Interpol’s website, the category of offence for Assange is simply stated as ‘Sex crimes’.

The Red Notice called for by Interpol is a request for the provisional arrest of a fugitive, prior to a possible extradition to the nation that issued the warrant. It means that Assange can be arrested anywhere in the world.

However Assange has hit back, claiming that the arrest warrant is part of a smear campaign by the US in retaliation for Wikileaks’ publishing of classified files.

Assange's lawyer said of the sex crime charges: "All of these offers [to co-operate with local authorities when Assange was in Sweden] have been flatly refused by a prosecutor who is abusing her powers by insisting that he return to Sweden at his own expense to be subjected to another media circus that she will orchestrate.

"Pursuing a warrant in this circumstance is entirely unnecessary and disproportionate."

Assange has been lying low since Wikileaks published its latest batch of documents. His mother spoke out today, saying that she was concerned and "reacting as any mother would".


read more: http://www.tntmagazine.com/tnt-today/archive/2010/12/01/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-hits-back-at-interpol-arrest-warrant.aspx#ixzz171zMldRT

Offline Decky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #63 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 08:10:56 am »
The Wikileaks service provider has closed the site down :rolleyes:

Offline Northerngimp

  • Brexit W*nker
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #64 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 08:12:23 am »
The Wikileaks service provider has closed the site down :rolleyes:

w*****s

Offline Northerngimp

  • Brexit W*nker
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #65 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 08:13:00 am »
He should just join as many forums as possible and dump the stuff in random places.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #66 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 08:32:04 am »
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/police-seek-julian-assange-rape-claims

What's all this then?

When he was in Sweden he offered to help with inquiries voluntarily it turns out and they didn't seem that interested till now...strange.


An arrest warrant for Assange has been issued by the International Public Prosecution Office in Gothenburg. On Interpol’s website, the category of offence for Assange is simply stated as ‘Sex crimes’.

The Red Notice called for by Interpolic is a request for the provisional arrest of a fugitive, prior to a possible extradition to the nation that issued the warrant. It means that Assange can be arrested anywhere in the world.

Should be ashamed of himself. :huff:
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline Dave

  • Administrator
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #67 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 09:16:44 am »
The news made it sound like just the domain is down. Can you not just enter the IP of the server?

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #68 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 01:58:51 pm »
Julian Assange answers your questions
The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, answers readers' questions about the release of more than 250,000 US diplomatic cables

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2010/dec/03/julian-assange-wikileaks

Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #69 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 02:44:29 pm »
Julian Assange answers your questions
The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, answers readers' questions about the release of more than 250,000 US diplomatic cables

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2010/dec/03/julian-assange-wikileaks




Fwoggie
I'll start the ball rolling with a question. You're an Australian passport holder - would you want return to your own country or is this now out of the question due to potentially being arrested on arrival for releasing cables relating to Australian diplomats and polices?
Julian Assange small

Julian Assange
I am an Australian citizen and I miss my country a great deal. However, during the last weeks the Australian prime minister, Julia Gillard, and the attorney general, Robert McClelland, have made it clear that not only is my return is impossible but that they are actively working to assist the United States government in its attacks on myself and our people. This brings into question what does it mean to be an Australian citizen - does that mean anything at all? Or are we all to be treated like David Hicks at the first possible opportunity merely so that Australian politicians and diplomats can be invited to the best US embassy cocktail parties.

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #70 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 04:56:12 pm »
When Interpol issued an arrest warrant earlier this week for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, the international police agency charged him with 'sex crimes,' but didn't specify any further, prompting rumors that he had been accused of rape. He hadn't. "It turns out," Washington's Blog reports, that "it was for violating an obscure Swedish law against having sex without a condom." During a business trip to Stockholm last August, Assange had unprotected sex with two women (a bizarre and painfully detailed account is available on the Daily Mail's website) who upon realizing that they had both slept with him—and that he had blown them both off—jointly approached police about his refusal to take an STD test. At the time, Assange's Swedish lawyer confirmed that "the principal concern the women had about Assange's behavior… related to his lack of interest in using condoms and his refusal to undergo testing, at the women's request, for sexually transmitted disease." (Assange actually did use a condom with one of the women, but it broke). This, apparently, is hazy legal territory in Sweden. While the "consent of both women to sex with Assange has been confirmed by prosecutors," as a former attorney wrote in an impassioned op-ed, Assange has been charged with something called 'sex by surprise,' which reportedly carries a $715 fine. According to Assange's London attorney, Mark Stephens, prosecutors have yet to explain the charges or meet with the WikiLeaks chief to discuss them, which he's agreed to do. "Whatever 'sex by surprise' is, it's only an offense in Sweden—not in the U.K. or the U.S. or even Ibiza," Stephens fumed. "I feel as if I'm in a surreal Swedish movie being threatened by bizarre trolls."

Washington's Blog |

 :mackems:



Offline Northerngimp

  • Brexit W*nker
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #71 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 05:00:18 pm »
f***ing hell what a bollocks charge.
 :lol:

Offline Parky

  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #72 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 05:22:25 pm »
f***ing hell what a bollocks charge.
 :lol:


Desperation stakes stuff.

Offline Northerngimp

  • Brexit W*nker
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #73 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 05:28:40 pm »
Indeed.

Offline GeordieMessiah

  • Forum Colossus
  • General Member
Re: WikiLeaks
« Reply #74 on: Friday 3 December 2010, 08:48:58 pm »
When Interpol issued an arrest warrant earlier this week for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, the international police agency charged him with 'sex crimes,' but didn't specify any further, prompting rumors that he had been accused of rape. He hadn't. "It turns out," Washington's Blog reports, that "it was for violating an obscure Swedish law against having sex without a condom." During a business trip to Stockholm last August, Assange had unprotected sex with two women (a bizarre and painfully detailed account is available on the Daily Mail's website) who upon realizing that they had both slept with him—and that he had blown them both off—jointly approached police about his refusal to take an STD test. At the time, Assange's Swedish lawyer confirmed that "the principal concern the women had about Assange's behavior… related to his lack of interest in using condoms and his refusal to undergo testing, at the women's request, for sexually transmitted disease." (Assange actually did use a condom with one of the women, but it broke). This, apparently, is hazy legal territory in Sweden. While the "consent of both women to sex with Assange has been confirmed by prosecutors," as a former attorney wrote in an impassioned op-ed, Assange has been charged with something called 'sex by surprise,' which reportedly carries a $715 fine. According to Assange's London attorney, Mark Stephens, prosecutors have yet to explain the charges or meet with the WikiLeaks chief to discuss them, which he's agreed to do. "Whatever 'sex by surprise' is, it's only an offense in Sweden—not in the U.K. or the U.S. or even Ibiza," Stephens fumed. "I feel as if I'm in a surreal Swedish movie being threatened by bizarre trolls."

Washington's Blog |

 :mackems:




Bizarre that someone's liberty can be at stake for not wearing a condom. Weird. :lol:
Whether it's God or the bomb
It's just the same
It's only fear under another name
And the corporate snakes coming in to feed
On that pathetic fact known as human greed
Skin and bone being raked over those hot coals
This dump never seems to give time for human soul