Author Topic: Sunderland...  (Read 1098237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Roger Kint

  • Guest
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14175 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:01:11 PM »
Havent read every page since the match but:

Do Sunderland even own a Left Back(not counting Richardson as he is a midfielder isnt he?)

How did they get away with reducing our allocation by 600 to allow for better segregation when the gap was clearly half the size it normally was behin the goal?

 :undecided:

There was a block of seats empty over by top corner probably to stop the mackems hoying their life savings from the SWC.

Ah ok cheers, wasnt visible on TV. They had definately cut the gap on the other side though.

Offline oscar

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14176 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:02:00 PM »
Quite a funny one here, originally posted 2 days before the game...   http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517

Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14177 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:04:56 PM »
Quote
Rob Elliot, they have a bid in for him, isnt he about 40?

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf05pwkt

:lol:

Quote
Pardew just been on the radio and confirmed they have a bid in for him

Now just stating they couldnt buy a full back any earlier, had to wait to sell first

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf0Dyoxb

Did that happen? Or is it just another made up Mackem fantasy

Quote
They kept going on about his free kick prowess in the championship anarl and every one i saw he booted it into the wall or over the bar. Anyone got any stats about how many free kicks this bloke actually scores?

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf0aqTjU

:troll:
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Offline Darth Crooks

  • General Member
  • The greatest show on Darth
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14178 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:05:47 PM »
You can, but he wasn't even attempting or intending to elbow Gyan's face was he?!
[/quote]

Just watched MOTD that I recorded last night, it looked bad, I think he was.

Regardless though, that Larsson handball so early in the game negates anything. :lol:
[/quote]

You know you're s**** when you can't elbow someone in the face properly  :lol: Canny strike though smiler  :thup:

BlacknWhiteArmy

  • Guest
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14179 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:09:20 PM »
Jesus, they actually think the Larsson handball is not worthy of a pen :lol:

Offline Darth Crooks

  • General Member
  • The greatest show on Darth
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14180 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:09:32 PM »
Quite a funny one here...   http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517


BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Gold! the sweet, sweet justice. Raylor you legendary blistered pisspot faced set piece demon you!

Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14181 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:12:39 PM »
Quote
Rob Elliot, they have a bid in for him, isnt he about 40?

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf05pwkt

:lol:

Quote
Pardew just been on the radio and confirmed they have a bid in for him

Now just stating they couldnt buy a full back any earlier, had to wait to sell first

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf0Dyoxb

Did that happen? Or is it just another made up Mackem fantasy

Quote
They kept going on about his free kick prowess in the championship anarl and every one i saw he booted it into the wall or over the bar. Anyone got any stats about how many free kicks this bloke actually scores?

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517#ixzz1Vf0aqTjU

:troll:

Oh hang on, we've got another one...

Quote
Ah right, he's been awful at striking a ball since he signed for the mags hasnt he ?

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=618517&page=2#ixzz1Vf2Lrk2r

:iamatwat:
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Offline adam

  • General Member
  • Thoroughly blue veining
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14182 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:15:00 PM »
Wheres wearside? ???


suggestions welcome

Sliding a lubricated fist up inside his grandmother?

Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14183 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:16:14 PM »
Wheres wearside? ???


suggestions welcome

Sliding a lubricated fist up inside his grandmother?

Needing lube for a Mackem Granny? :nope:
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Offline Sima

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14184 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:16:50 PM »
You can clearly see a mackem calling Shola a black c*** after he missed his offside header

"Classy"

Offline Sima

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14185 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:18:40 PM »
There's a general consensus on there that they dominated the entire game.

Baffling.

Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14186 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:19:29 PM »
There's a general consensus on there that they dominated the entire game.

Baffling.

:lol:
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Offline JH

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14187 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:20:56 PM »
There's a general consensus on there that they dominated the entire game.

Baffling.

tbf, they really dominated us in shots off-target and fouls.

Shame we dominated them in shots on-target and goals like...

Offline cp40

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14188 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:21:36 PM »
There's a general consensus on there that they dominated the entire game.

Baffling.

let them believe it, it just repeats the process in the build up to the next Derby,  realisation only starts to hit them after January anyway. It also makes beating them double the laughs -

see.... :lol: :lol:

Offline PineBarrens

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14189 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:21:45 PM »
It wasn't all bad news for sunderland fans yesterday - Darren Bent scored.

Offline cp40

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14190 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:22:36 PM »
It wasn't all bad news for sunderland fans yesterday - Darren Bent scored.

and phillips, and kilbane....



Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14191 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:23:13 PM »
There's a general consensus on there that they dominated the entire game.

Baffling.

let them believe it, it just repeats the process in the build up to the next Derby,  realisation only starts to hit them after January anyway. It also makes beating them double the laughs -

see.... :lol: :lol:

Aye, by march they'll be fully convinced they're the best team headed for a walkover victory again...
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Haris Vuckic

  • Guest
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14192 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:23:14 PM »

Offline Klaus

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14193 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:42:32 PM »
Just been reading this thread from SMB, dont know if someone has already posted it, but some of the delusional opinions on here are a f***ing joke :facepalm:

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=619766

People saying that the larsson handball wasnt intentional...

Offline BlueStar

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14194 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:45:37 PM »
It's basically what gives us the upper hand even in times of crisis. "Cannit wait man, we're gonna batter them, hope it's 4 or 5 nil, fancy such and such for a hat trick, we're going got Europe, they're a yo-yo team" Then five minutes into the game "s***, why haven't we scored? They've had a shot! Why aren't we all over them? How come there are two teams in the game? f***, what if we don't win? f***s SAKE CLEAR IT SHOOT TACKLE HIM BOO! What if we lose, PANIC PANIC BRUCE MAN WHAT ARE YOU DOING WHY DID HE MISS THAT SHOT, IS HE A MAG?! IT'S BECAUSE BRUCE IS A MAG! f*** OFF STEWARD ARE YOU A f***ing MAG? BET ALL THESE COPPERS ARE MAGS, AND THE MEDIA! THE REF'S A f***ing MAG! AM I A MAG?! Wait, blacked out for a second there. Ah, f***, we've lost again."

Offline Ryan_Taylor

  • General Member
  • James Perchenbauer
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14195 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:47:48 PM »
'AM I A MAG?' :lol:
Sports Direct Signature
'Billionaires apply within'

Offline Skeletor

  • General Member
  • I joined Newcastle before they were mainstream
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14196 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:48:54 PM »


At least they beat us on fouls. Moral victory \o/
'Rock over London, Rock on Chicago! Wheaties: breakfast of champions.'

Offline Neil

  • Moderator
  • The stretched twig of peace is at melting point
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14197 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:49:44 PM »
We're better than them ====> Yeah, 3-1 (to quote Wearside) ====> this is the game that matters ====> lose ====> ignore all ref decisions going our way ====> it was sheer luck they won ====> actually that game doesn't matter, it's the end of the season ====> 2nd derby game, we'll go there and win, they're so deluded (note: hypocrisy overload) ====> end of the season doesn't matter, it's this game that matters ====> lose ====> Bruce out, look at all those ex-Geordies sabotaging us ====> we'll still finish above them ====> don't
Thomas the Tank Engine is a f***ing c***.

Offline Neil

  • Moderator
  • The stretched twig of peace is at melting point
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14198 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:50:30 PM »


At least they beat us on fouls. Moral victory \o/

Torn you a new one on shots off target.
Thomas the Tank Engine is a f***ing c***.

Offline Klaus

  • General Member
Re: Sunderland
« Reply #14199 on: Sunday 21 August 2011, 12:51:21 PM »


At least they beat us on fouls. Moral victory \o/
That f***ing cattermole probably did 15 of those fouls, he is such a dirty player it is unreal...