Author Topic: St. James' Park  (Read 1224946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ketsbaia

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12750 on: Sunday 3 May 2020, 02:16:34 PM »
Death by Gallowsgate

Offline manorpark

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12751 on: Sunday 3 May 2020, 03:06:53 PM »

Offline NEEJ

  • General Member
  • Kent
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12752 on: Wednesday 6 May 2020, 11:35:09 PM »
I almost welled up on my run this morning as SJP came into view from the Walker riverside walk. :lol: It's f***ing majestic and I can't wait for it to get the care and attention it deserves.

This is near enough exactly what I was talking about: ?s=19

Online chopey

  • General Member
  • Co Durham, England.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12753 on: Friday 8 May 2020, 10:37:55 AM »
?s=20

Well this is f***ing horrible, does The Strawberry not have a right to light ?
Mike Ashley stole my 30's

Online Yorkie

  • General Member
  • C'mTA
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12754 on: Friday 8 May 2020, 11:43:19 AM »
Maybe but if right to light was the most important thing there'd never be any city centre development anywhere.

Online Stifleaay

  • Heavy scarer of dogs
  • General Member
  • Come here you ginger bitch.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12755 on: Friday 8 May 2020, 11:49:00 AM »
It’s important to note that this particular development is not the development that is feared would block an expansion of the Gallowgate end. The developers and the owners of The Strawberry have also worked together and the Strawberry owners were in favour of the development.

Offline LFEE

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12756 on: Friday 8 May 2020, 11:59:19 AM »
It’s important to note that this particular development is not the development that is feared would block an expansion of the Gallowgate end. The developers and the owners of The Strawberry have also worked together and the Strawberry owners were in favour of the development.

Of course they were. The Strawberry has never give a toss about the fight against Ashley.

Offline Whiteshoes

  • New Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12757 on: Sunday 10 May 2020, 09:25:18 PM »
When or if the new owners come in,we need to knock the Leazes end down and put the old one back up.The blueprint must be somewhere.

Online Stifleaay

  • Heavy scarer of dogs
  • General Member
  • Come here you ginger bitch.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12758 on: Sunday 10 May 2020, 10:16:17 PM »
When or if the new owners come in,we need to knock the Leazes end down and put the old one back up.The blueprint must be somewhere.
You want to knock down the current fairly modern stand for a lower capacity stand?

Offline geordie_b

  • General Member
  • Gateshead, UK
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12759 on: Sunday 10 May 2020, 10:43:37 PM »
When or if the new owners come in,we need to knock the Leazes end down and put the old one back up.The blueprint must be somewhere.

Great first post

Offline Slim

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12760 on: Sunday 10 May 2020, 11:06:14 PM »
Could give a f*** about the strawberry. Knock the f***er down for them refusing to be part of the anti Ashley stuff.

Offline ToonTastic

  • Administrator
  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12761 on: Tuesday 12 May 2020, 01:07:22 PM »
What was the piece in the Athletic about the training ground ?

Offline Wandy

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12762 on: Thursday 14 May 2020, 11:08:15 PM »
Grim.


Offline Ian W

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12763 on: Friday 15 May 2020, 10:08:16 AM »
It'll be hideous if you can't see SJP from all around. Especially if we get good.

Under Ashley I'd rather not see it at all.

Offline NEEJ

  • General Member
  • Kent
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12764 on: Friday 15 May 2020, 10:20:10 AM »
Grim.

I still can't believe how utterly minging the proposed buildings are. They're gonna be a massive f***ing eyesore.

Offline JCONA

  • General Member
  • I'm not living. I'm just killing time.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12765 on: Friday 15 May 2020, 11:36:12 AM »
tweet deleted?

Online chopey

  • General Member
  • Co Durham, England.
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12766 on: Friday 15 May 2020, 06:45:45 PM »
Regis Prograis has just called out Lewis Ritson, that would be a sensation at the new Saudi St James Park
Mike Ashley stole my 30's

Offline GWN

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12767 on: Monday 18 May 2020, 07:33:55 PM »
I can confirm the development in the car park next to the Strawberry to the left walking up from china town will soon be started and the contractor is from Sunderland Tolent who have done Hadrian tower , it was on my LinkedIn .
Returning NUFC fan after a long time away.

Offline NE27

  • General Member
Re: St. James' Park
« Reply #12768 on: Monday 18 May 2020, 07:50:35 PM »
Grim.


This development may be different, but I hate how the developer always sells some s*** pipe dream about creating new communities and hundreds of jobs when in reality that rarely happens.

I work on most new developments within the north east and they're a f***ing travesty. Absolute s*** that clearly won't stand the test of time in build and aesthetics. And always there is this vision of something amazing, and invariably it becomes some s*** student accom. With a Tesco/Sainsbury's express tagged on it and a coffee shop.

Offers jackshit to the wider community other than tired unkept high rises filled with dirty students  ;D (I understand the wider picture in regards to students and their spending etc. But still!)

Newcastle helix being the exception mind.