Poll

Can the Saudi's get the deal 'over the line'?

Yes - and want it to.
No - but want it to.
Yes - and don't want them as NUFC Owners
No - and don't want the as NUFC Owners

Author Topic: Takeover Thread  (Read 457060 times)

Weznufc, FloydianMag, Judge Holden, Darth Crooks, The Prophet, Naicou, Strawberry, Kevin A, BergenMagpie (+ 3 Hidden) and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline LFEE

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11875 on: Today at 02:50:50 AM »
?s=21

Offline Charlies

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11876 on: Today at 04:02:46 AM »
it's not taking it outside, it's "taking a side conversation that's wholly unrelated to the thread to PMs"

I'm quite capable of apologising in 'public' for something I've said in 'public' thanks.

And as Loki pointed out above it's a laughable request, you c***.

I was trying to move the issue you clearly have with my spelling, to private, as in away from the thread. It wasn't a threat anyway, I may be dumb but I'm not a f***ing idiot. No watching letterboxes here.

'You're a massive c***. PM iz'

:lol:

Stick to making s*** bait for the Jeremy Kyle crowd. Cheese slice pedo of the highest degree, you. First class honours in pasta noncery. :lol:

Crikey [emoji38]

I agree with Stan's original assessment; if the meaning is clear then what's the problem? It's just not the case that if you're not writing in correct and formal English then your point is invalidated.

Some people just make mistakes; some people are just lazy; some people genuinely can't do it. If you're getting irritated when people, for whatever reason, don't come up to your own personal level of what constitutes good English, even if their point is perfectly well made and clear, then it's you that has the real issue :aww:

Anyway, about that 2021 deadline

:thup:

I'm classified as dyslexic, I couldn't read at all until I was in year 6 so around about 10 year old, but, I still excelled in other categories. Unfortunately though this has followed me all of my life when I was younger it'd often result in violence, sometimes I get extremely irked like my previous post. I shouldn't I know but old habits die hard.

Apologies all.



Dont Apologise, some folk need to dial it back a bit.  :thup:

Edit, I have highlighted my own errors.  :lol:

Its a laugh man, I actually don't want anyone to feel bad for taking the p*ss. I deserve it. The above I've quoted, no worries its granted & I needed it. Apart from @Thomson Mouse hes still a c***. 

And just to make it clear,  I'm on here as I'm the on call subsea engineer for a shell job in Australia.  Not bad for a lad who doesn't know the difference between there, their & they're.  Eh?

Online thomas

  • NO's Best Foreigner - Participant
  • General Member
  • arf
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11877 on: Today at 04:05:37 AM »
did ... did tm think that was you when he quoted me or was I just randomly assigned c*** status :lol: :lol: Missed that first time 'round.

Offline Thomson Mouse

  • General Member
  • Perth, Western Australia
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11878 on: Today at 06:18:31 AM »
it's not taking it outside, it's "taking a side conversation that's wholly unrelated to the thread to PMs"

I'm quite capable of apologising in 'public' for something I've said in 'public' thanks.

And as Loki pointed out above it's a laughable request, you c***.

I was trying to move the issue you clearly have with my spelling, to private, as in away from the thread. It wasn't a threat anyway, I may be dumb but I'm not a f***ing idiot. No watching letterboxes here.

'You're a massive c***. PM iz'

:lol:

Stick to making s*** bait for the Jeremy Kyle crowd. Cheese slice pedo of the highest degree, you. First class honours in pasta noncery. :lol:

Crikey [emoji38]

I agree with Stan's original assessment; if the meaning is clear then what's the problem? It's just not the case that if you're not writing in correct and formal English then your point is invalidated.

Some people just make mistakes; some people are just lazy; some people genuinely can't do it. If you're getting irritated when people, for whatever reason, don't come up to your own personal level of what constitutes good English, even if their point is perfectly well made and clear, then it's you that has the real issue :aww:

Anyway, about that 2021 deadline

:thup:

I'm classified as dyslexic, I couldn't read at all until I was in year 6 so around about 10 year old, but, I still excelled in other categories. Unfortunately though this has followed me all of my life when I was younger it'd often result in violence, sometimes I get extremely irked like my previous post. I shouldn't I know but old habits die hard.

Apologies all.



Dont Apologise, some folk need to dial it back a bit.  :thup:

Edit, I have highlighted my own errors.  :lol:

Its a laugh man, I actually don't want anyone to feel bad for taking the p*ss. I deserve it. The above I've quoted, no worries its granted & I needed it. Apart from @Thomson Mouse hes still a c***. 

And just to make it clear,  I'm on here as I'm the on call subsea engineer for a shell job in Australia.  Not bad for a lad who doesn't know the difference between there, their & they're.  Eh?

Yes, yes you're still calling me a c***. I've apologised, f*** off with your whining and move on.
People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people.

Offline Thomson Mouse

  • General Member
  • Perth, Western Australia
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11879 on: Today at 06:20:18 AM »
did ... did tm think that was you when he quoted me or was I just randomly assigned c*** status :lol: :lol: Missed that first time 'round.

No, it was a light-hearted dig at you expecting me to PM him as Loki had pointed out :thup:
People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people.

Offline nufcjb

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11880 on: Today at 06:36:15 AM »
Pheww. Thought I was in RTG for a moment reading through that back and forth in a takeover thread.

Online wormy

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11881 on: Today at 07:24:49 AM »
Wow. And to think I was only dreading the Hatice talk when I clicked to view this final page.

Offline Dr.Spaceman

  • General Member
  • Le Champion
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11882 on: Today at 07:26:08 AM »

Right on cue, Hatice is back....

Goddam that woman trying to sue the Saudis for dismembering her fiancée, does she have no shame

And right on cue, these people are back.
Cricket > Football > Football with no fans > No Football

Offline Dokko

  • TT
  • General Member
  • Norm life baby
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11883 on: Today at 07:58:16 AM »
Surely she'll be too busy lobbying F1 for adding SA to the calendar next year? There's a lot of miles in that for her.

Offline Awaymag

  • New Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11884 on: Today at 08:08:15 AM »
Surely she'll be too busy lobbying F1 for adding SA to the calendar next year? There's a lot of miles in that for her.
Cause not, she loves F1.

Offline Kasper

  • Best Penguin
  • General Member
  • Hello. Nice to meet you.
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11885 on: Today at 08:11:00 AM »
?s=21


:jesuswept:

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11886 on: Today at 11:13:46 AM »

Right on cue, Hatice is back....

Was she this vocal before the takeover news broke?

Has that got anything to do with her? I can't be sure but she may well have been crying every day, but because the media didn't inform you of it, you think she's been sipping singapore slings in Sydney

Online Chris_R

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11887 on: Today at 11:25:41 AM »
I find it hard to be too angry at her after what happened to her partner, but she does seem to harbour exclusive energy for only stopping our takeover, and seems to not give a solitary s*** about Saudi buyouts of anything else, anywhere in the rest of the world.

I can't accept that she just specifically cares about the moral future of NUFC, so the only other option is she's being manipulated, pushed or funded by someone or something else in the background. I think acknowledging and questioning this is fine.

Offline Jackie Broon

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11888 on: Today at 11:38:01 AM »
I find it hard to be too angry at her after what happened to her partner, but she does seem to harbour exclusive energy for only stopping our takeover, and seems to not give a solitary s*** about Saudi buyouts of anything else, anywhere in the rest of the world.

I can't accept that she just specifically cares about the moral future of NUFC, so the only other option is she's being manipulated, pushed or funded by someone or something else in the background. I think acknowledging and questioning this is fine.

The latest news is regarding civil legal action being brought against MbS in the US, absolutely nothing to do with the takeover.

Offline loki679

  • General Member
  • 中国
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11889 on: Today at 11:46:59 AM »
I find it hard to be too angry at her after what happened to her partner, but she does seem to harbour exclusive energy for only stopping our takeover, and seems to not give a solitary s*** about Saudi buyouts of anything else, anywhere in the rest of the world.

I can't accept that she just specifically cares about the moral future of NUFC, so the only other option is she's being manipulated, pushed or funded by someone or something else in the background. I think acknowledging and questioning this is fine.

That'd be @Charlies.
Comfy chairs, beer, and doom. Humanity's future is an early 90s LAN party.

Offline sadnesstan

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11890 on: Today at 12:00:54 PM »
I find it hard to be too angry at her after what happened to her partner, but she does seem to harbour exclusive energy for only stopping our takeover, and seems to not give a solitary s*** about Saudi buyouts of anything else, anywhere in the rest of the world.

I can't accept that she just specifically cares about the moral future of NUFC, so the only other option is she's being manipulated, pushed or funded by someone or something else in the background. I think acknowledging and questioning this is fine.

Or she's going through the motions, and certain organisations are shining a spotlight on her at appropriate times.

Offline The Ideal Crash

  • General Member
  • Paddy with a Northern Soul
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11891 on: Today at 12:28:58 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

Offline OCK

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11892 on: Today at 12:32:17 PM »
Maybe when the Saudis kept the WWE Superstars hostage it was to keep them as new signings for the Newcastle takeover.  :icon_scratch:

Offline Jackie Broon

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11893 on: Today at 12:58:54 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

It's got f*** all to do with the takeover, it's only people in this thread that are connecting the two and it's, quite frankly, a bit embarrassing. It's not driven by some grand conspiracy against NUFC, we are peripheral in all this and not even being mentioned in this particular instance.

Online Strawberry

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11894 on: Today at 01:14:51 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

It's got f*** all to do with the takeover, it's only people in this thread that are connecting the two and it's, quite frankly, a bit embarrassing. It's not driven by some grand conspiracy against NUFC, we are peripheral in all this and not even being mentioned in this particular instance.

Exactly it is embarrassing. There is nothing which can link this two up. It is also shameful to side with MBS on this killing of the journalists. Grow up guys it is below the point of decency on this. 

Offline loki679

  • General Member
  • 中国
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11895 on: Today at 01:44:03 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

It's got f*** all to do with the takeover, it's only people in this thread that are connecting the two and it's, quite frankly, a bit embarrassing. It's not driven by some grand conspiracy against NUFC, we are peripheral in all this and not even being mentioned in this particular instance.

Exactly it is embarrassing. There is nothing which can link this two up. It is also shameful to side with MBS on this killing of the journalists. Grow up guys it is below the point of decency on this. 

Depends really.  If we're talking about a Caulkin then, yeah, f*** that s***.  If it's an Edwards or a Ryder then....meh, maybe we can let one or two slide.
Comfy chairs, beer, and doom. Humanity's future is an early 90s LAN party.

Online neesy111

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11896 on: Today at 01:44:55 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

It's got f*** all to do with the takeover, it's only people in this thread that are connecting the two and it's, quite frankly, a bit embarrassing. It's not driven by some grand conspiracy against NUFC, we are peripheral in all this and not even being mentioned in this particular instance.

Exactly it is embarrassing. There is nothing which can link this two up. It is also shameful to side with MBS on this killing of the journalists. Grow up guys it is below the point of decency on this. 

:thup:

Online wormy

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11897 on: Today at 01:45:32 PM »
Why would a US court entertain it? Even if it happened there I’d still have my doubts it would go ahead.

This is no more than a way to drill up bad press ahead of something that’s about to happen

It's got f*** all to do with the takeover, it's only people in this thread that are connecting the two and it's, quite frankly, a bit embarrassing. It's not driven by some grand conspiracy against NUFC, we are peripheral in all this and not even being mentioned in this particular instance.

Exactly it is embarrassing. There is nothing which can link this two up. It is also shameful to side with MBS on this killing of the journalists. Grow up guys it is below the point of decency on this. 

Depends really.  If we're talking about a Caulkin then, yeah, f*** that s***.  If it's an Edwards or a Ryder then....meh, maybe we can let one or two slide.

How generous of you to put those two in the journalist category.

Online Judge Holden

  • General Member
Re: Takeover Thread
« Reply #11898 on: Today at 02:13:45 PM »
A lot of tension in here.