timeEd32

Isn’t this just another way of saying players have Champions League bonuses, except doing it in a negative way?

I didn't see the whole game, but I was definitely confused at the time why the first one didn't get more attention.

Why are there always announcements at Goodison like there’s a train departing on track 7?

Truly dreadful.

Don’t like that

Interesting. I'd be all in if I could work remotely as a second job.

So Madrid, PSG, and Roma would have to go through with no more than two draws (or one win, one draw) from the German clubs. And then Villa would need to win the ECL with three wins. Not entirely impossible...

They've done absolutely nothing in the second half. Really expected more.

It appears to reference the old Laws of the Game that the shootout is not technically part of the match. The match officially ends when extra time ends. The shootout is just a thing that happens after. Funnily enough, this guy on Reddit accidentally predicted this would happen to Martinez:

Liverpool turning this around wouldn't be entirely shocking either. Maybe there's hope...

£140m is also roughly what would give us a £100m profit factoring in remaining amortisation. IMO that should be the floor for even considering it.

If they are willing to do this then we'll at least listen

He only remotely makes sense in a world in which we sell Bruno and Tonali is the direct Bruno replacement. Not a world I want to think about.

.com is one thing, but it's also better branding. tottenhamhotspur.com mancity.com manutd.com arsenal.com liverpoolfc.com realmadrid.com juventus.com It's a very small step, but indicative of the type of thinking we're doing. Good to see.

True, Chelsea more likely to screw us over.