Jump to content

FloydianMag

Member
  • Posts

    2,256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About FloydianMag

  1. They’re correct though and to be fair Man City have always been opposed to FFP/FMV/PSR/RPT for the same reason, they’re anti competitive. It’s another example of governing bodies involving themselves in clubs commercial activities. The more rules the PL put in place around finances the more likely it is that a club will challenge it legally.
  2. I could see the PFA mounting a legal challenge to salary caps, FIFA and the PL have already lost a case when they attempted to cap agents fees.
  3. It would still leave some of the players you’re looking to offload way out of reach for most PL clubs though.
  4. Unless it’s in their contracts………..no chance of them taking a pay cut.
  5. If anyone does come in for any of them they’re going to have to take a significant pay cut. Can’t see it, can you?
  6. Like fuck, Employment Tribunals give legally binding rulings on employment not some quasi sporting body.
  7. For £2 million………get to fuck, and this isn’t a CAS issue it’s Employment Law, CAS doesn’t have jurisdiction.
  8. We didn’t play at the weekend and one of them was arrested at the stadium, so unlikely to be us.
  9. They’d still end up with both 🤷🏼‍♂️
  10. Leave the PL? The twats wanted both, it was never a choice for them.
  11. Fuck them……….another blatant attempt to strangle revenue streams. I hope this ban includes the annual PL competition in the US or Asia……..I suspect not. Why the fuck do governing bodies get involved in clubs commercial activities?
  12. Forests owner doesn’t give a fuck, he’ll try and bring all the corrupt fuckers down.
  13. NFFC considering legal action against Sky
  14. Hope BHA don’t have a sell on clause🤣
×
×
  • Create New...