Jump to content

Judge Holden

Member
  • Posts

    1,898
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. There are only two people that appear to be ITK on here and neither have said it is close. Mimms has said that it may be a few weeks today but before that has always said that it would be months. Mimms did say make sure you have cans or something along those lines but yesterday’s news shows is the takeover isn’t anywhere close to being back on. Please don't say what he didn't say. He said you might want to make room for can's. However it will be few weeks later not now. Jesus
  2. He's a random user with a funny twitter account & an inside scoop on the takeover.
  3. So no criticism from outside NUST is welcomed or to be listened to? Great attitude If it’s justified for sure. I still don’t think people understand what the role of NUST is and how it allows people like yourself to get involved in it. Whats the point of you defending them. Once they slept in with masters their reputation is dead. I would have giving them the benefit of doubt but the previous members ( like Thomas got re-elected ) so it is hopeless. I try to defend them because the couple of people I know who are involved in it give up a hell of a lot of their free time unpaid for the long term good of the club. It’s a hard gig at any club I’d imagine but with our owners almost thankless. Seems to be the case with some of the fan base too. I reckon Strawberry posts on the internet wearing a life vest.
  4. Quite the scoop You really are miserable ain’t you Personally would have banned him before Penn. Nobody should be banned!
  5. He clearly does, like Does he? He comes on here & says his bit, logs off and leaves behind a load of posters squabbling over him. He'll return in 3 or 4 days and repeat the same trick. He doesn't care. There's no stopping him. Yup, there it is. Like a bull to a red rag. It's what he deserves for having a different opinion! Opinions are fine, being as arrogant and dismissive as he’s been about others will finally piss off someone who can do something about it. He was on the wind up, he succeeded and is now banned. Nowt else to say really, he didn’t want to converse, just wanted to stir shit and leave. Text book wum and in the end one wumming post too many. He was harmless man.
  6. He clearly does, like Does he? He comes on here & says his bit, logs off and leaves behind a load of posters squabbling over him. He'll return in 3 or 4 days and repeat the same trick. He doesn't care. There's no stopping him. Yup, there it is. Like a bull to a red rag. It's what he deserves for having a different opinion!
  7. Its not like he was being abusive or anything, nor was he polluting threads with nonesense. He's perfectly entitled to his opinion. He's been right so far in that fuck all has really happened. Harsh to ban someone because he has a different opinion to most/is Luke Edwards. Exactly. If you didn't like what he said just scroll past it. Sure it was your comment that planted the seed to ban him Aye in hindsight. Banning him for fuckall man.
  8. Its not like he was being abusive or anything, nor was he polluting threads with nonesense. He's perfectly entitled to his opinion. He's been right so far in that fuck all has really happened. Harsh to ban someone because he has a different opinion to most/is Luke Edwards. Exactly. If you didn't like what he said just scroll past it.
  9. Wouldn't look forward to it too much. Ya haven't banned him ffs? He isn't IP banned, so all he has to do is return as a less depressing, boring, condescending bellend to be able to blend in. Something tells me he'd still manage to stick out like a sore thumb though. Amazing.
  10. What a fucking baby. Hope we get him back like.
×
×
  • Create New...