healthyaddiction

I thought Burnley were in good form?

They're missing 3 centre backs and 2 full backs. We're no missing 3 centre backs and two full backs. I think you're being for too kind to them.

Not sure I'm overly worried about Man City having enough to beat this Man U team.

Aren't the rumours that you guys are looking the hire the guy sacked by Bayern for failing to win the Bundesliga? Not sure Ten Hag will walk it.

Prefer to take the 4pt deduction. Where has the needing 6m come from though? Don't remember seeing that anywhere.

Also in that article, congratulations to Mark Gillespie on the 12-year contract. Contracted until he's 44. lol

Good video, but who has ever said the Villa goal was a cross? I think the bloke has just made that up.

Yeah, there were actually reports that they had to sell before the end of June or they'd be in PSR trouble and were looking to sell Jacob Ramsey. I can only presume that is a nonsense though.

Dan Marino?

I think it's a little unclear if it's as well as or in place of. At first I thought it was as well as, but a few places seem to think it's in place of it. Such as Kieran Maguire. Obviously there are the UEFA rules as well which would need to be complied with when in Europe, but the punishment on those seems less of a deterant.

No we can't. There is no world where we win all four and Tottenham fail to win at least two.

The own goal was from his corner too right? I know it's not an assist but still created the goal. Could have had another if he didn't kick the turf when squaring to Isak.

Pope is better than Onana, Botman is better than Maguire. You've been a bit selective with how you've matched up players in midfield. The combined midfield would be Bruno, Bruno & Tonali or Joelinton. Not sure about Barnes v Garnacho.

Isn't it reported that Isak, and several other players, have clauses that reduce their pay if we don't qualify for champions league? The new contract for Isak was reported as being in response to this. Could be that the club see the pay reduction as a good opportunity to convince Isak to extend and protect our prize asset, plus keep him happy. 'Extend one year and your at won't drop' situation?

Isn't there a big difference in the 3 year loss we can make though? This year we had to balance our two losses of nearly 60m and so has to make a right 10m profit. Assuming we've made that 10m profit this year, next season we could take another nearly 60m loss and still be within PSR for three year losses. Anything the new 70% roles don't come in for next season, which they're not meant to.