Jump to content

Martin Dúbravka


Figures 1-0 Football

Recommended Posts

From Hardy;

@mhardysport 3m3 minutes ago

Martin Dubravka, 2018/19, in numbers:

CLEAN SHEETS:

7 (5th highest in Premier League)

GOALS CONCEDED:

34 (9th best)

SAVES:

77 (6th best)

PUNCHES:

10 (8th best)

HIGH CLAIMS:

25 (2nd best)

SWEEPER CLEARANCES:

12 (6th best)

 

Can’t wait to see David Edgar’s star graphs proving why Darlow is even better.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the level we are at and the lack of ambition from the club he's okay starting for us. Wonder if Rafa will look again at Sels when he comes back, he bought him (presumably) and he's having a good season in France.

 

What the actual fuck man?  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the level we are at and the lack of ambition from the club he's okay starting for us. Wonder if Rafa will look again at Sels when he comes back, he bought him (presumably) and he's having a good season in France.

 

What the actual fuck man?  :lol:

 

:lol: Sels. That dude was whack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s weak. 

 

Yeah, you've said. Lots.

 

It's still a foul.

 

It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match.

 

Refereeing decisions can go against you.

 

Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul.  In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. 

 

Some arms on him.  No body.  No push.  Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s weak. 

 

Yeah, you've said. Lots.

 

It's still a foul.

 

It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match.

 

Refereeing decisions can go against you.

 

Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul.  In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. 

 

Some arms on him.  No body.  No push.  Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo.

 

Your post is fundamentally wrong man.

 

1) Rafa said the refs don't know the rules in England, implying he felt it was a foul. He even motioned it as such after the match.

2) Dubravka went up with 2 hands to catch and Boly went up and used the face/shoulders of Dubravka to gain leverage to get higher and move his head back and body back. Look at pictures if you didn't already. It wasn't some arms, arms change just as much leverage as anything else, he climbed on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NobbyOhNobby

It’s weak. 

 

Yeah, you've said. Lots.

 

It's still a foul.

 

It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match.

 

Refereeing decisions can go against you.

 

Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul.  In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. 

 

Some arms on him.  No body.  No push.  Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo.

I'm with you man

Link to post
Share on other sites

‘Boly wanted it more’. What a pile of wank. Dubravka was backtracking because of a ridiculously mishit cross that favoured Boly’s starting position. Dubs was almost dead centre of his goal, Boly was running on to it from deep so was always going to have leverage. Throw in the fact he’s clearly fouled him and to say ‘he wanted it more’ is pure bollocks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned by myself and a few others in this thread, the players and Dubravka didn't even call for a foul at the time. You just had Lascelles shouting at him and Dubravka's face told the story afterwards. He knew he fucked up.

 

He will learn from it, we move on chaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s weak. 

 

Yeah, you've said. Lots.

 

It's still a foul.

 

It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match.

 

Refereeing decisions can go against you.

 

Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul.  In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. 

 

Some arms on him.  No body.  No push.  Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo.

 

De Jong wanted it more.

 

http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/Sports/GTY_soccer_controversial_2010_kick_kab_140625_4x3_992.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...