Jump to content

Stifler

Member
  • Posts

    36,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Stifler

  • Rank
    :thumb:
  1. We can only spend 70% of our revenue in anyway, so allowing us to spend 5 times more than say Sheffield United’s revenue, which would be about £525m is pointless, because our revenue is only about £250m, and we can only spend 70% of that in anyway. The anchoring proposals are not scrapping the 70% rules brought in place last week.
  2. As someone who drives an HGV, and actually passed my test with the same company, maybe I could clarify. A lot of people do their HGV for horse boxes, usually you only need a C1 licence for horse boxes, but the price of it is the same as the C1 (rigid) HGV licence, so a lot of people actually just go for that, and that covers them incase they go over weight/size dimensions of their vehicle. Also this country is getting a lot more camper vans of a bigger size, some of which require either the C1 or C licence. It will 100% be for either or both of those reasons. It’s laughable to think that a footballer would drive an HGV for a living after retiring. My dad is on the upper scale of what an HGV driver earns, and he is paid that much because of booth his experience, and the fact that he’s qualified to carry hazardous chemicals. One chemical he is allowed to carry, only 14 drivers in the country are allowed to carry it, not even ADR (hazardous materials) trainers are even qualified to carry it. His annual wage is probably the same as what Ritchie earns in a week.
  3. No one knows, there is conflicting reports, but PSG’s previous gives precedence of avoiding anything other than just financial penalties. I don’t see how the anchoring would help us without scrapping the 70%/80% rules they voted for last week.
  4. Yeah, I also missed out how Hoffman who was brought in by the Premier League to stop our takeover, was sacked not long after our takeover took place.
  5. I have to say like, if we lost, then it would likely be used as starting point for scrapping transfer fees for players. We would just have clubs going, nah we are not paying, see you in court, or getting the players to do so and funding them.
  6. They are trying to stop post season friendlies when there are international games. It won’t have any bearing on our Australia games as it won’t come into effect in time, and it was organised before the rules changed. It is very much more evidence that the Premier League and the FA are trying to block our every move. We should go for another CAT case. ‘Your honour, this court in 2021 was due to decide if the Premier League had attempted to block our takeover. Before going to trial the Premier League tried to prevent us from showing evidence which would have harmed their defence, this court rules that the evidence could be used. Within a week the Premier League agreed an out of court deal to enable the takeover. Since then stricter rules on FFP/PSR have been introduced, with clubs like Everton, and Nottingham Forest being used as an example to us, whilst clubs like Chelsea, and Man City who are allegedly breaking the rules are having no sanctions so far unplaced upon them. We have been told that we have to create revenue now, however all our commercial deals over £1m have to be approved via the Premier League, with proposals put in place that they cannot increase by more than 10% per year upon existing deals. We got told that we must sell players to create revenue. We had to sell one of our players below his reported market value because they introduced new rules on related parties between clubs and transfer deals, despite teams like Watford, Man City, Chelsea, and in Europe the Red Bull teams all previously active in such deals without question. This is further supported by the same clubs buying our players at below market value, buying players from Liverpool, and Chelsea from well above their reported market value. When a newspaper made a false claim of us loaning players from the Saudi clubs, the Premier League then voted on and introduced rules preventing the loaning of players from said clubs, this despite teams like Watford once again being able to do that routinely and freely without question previously. As a way of trying to create more match day income, we have been looking into either expanding our stadium, or building a new one. The Premier League clubs have proposed that this should now be a part of the expenditure for FFP/PSR rules, despite numerous clubs previously being able to do so without such limitations of their finances. In another attempt to increase our commercial income, we decided to go on a post season tour which would have brought us an increase in revenue, this was due to be played in our own free time, and outside our competitive commitments. They used the fact that we would allegedly use players who were due to go away for international duty a few weeks later as justification, without even knowing which players we planned on taking.’
  7. Maybe we should take Man Utd to court for tapping him up then.
  8. Need to put some blame on the players though. Far too many of them have seen the likes of Joelinton, Bruno, and Isak get very close to their man before passing it or going past them. A lot of our players seem to think that they can do that ask well and spend far too long on the ball. There are simple passes open and they either run into trouble, wait to be closed down, or make the pass to the player who has 1 or 2 markers on him. It has been a consistent occurrence in our defeats. We get so giddy from having a good win previously and seem to think that we are world beaters. There is no need to not be making the simple pass to retain possession, there is no need for Schar to pass back to the goalkeeper when every other player for us is in front of him and we have been pressing Palace, there is no need for Dubravka once he’s got that pass to keep a hold of it until their attacker is a foot away from him. It’s simple fucking stuff that even us on Reds vs Blues don’t do.
  9. Would have won a few games if they played. If Hall wasn’t ready, then why the fuck have we went out of the way to bring him in with money that we don’t have when he’s hardly played?
  10. This. Absolute no fucking desire to get going at all today.
  11. Fucking Matt Ritchie still getting games for us. What the fuck is the point in making these subs in the 90th minute when we have gone 2-0 down. It’s embarrassing.
  12. Absolutely can’t stand Palace. Owned and previously owned by conmen who have good PR people. No ambition what so ever, supported by middle class pretend socialists, and aside from the guy with the drum, there is more spice in the herbs section of the supermarket next door than there is in their crowd.
  13. How the fuck is that a foul and the penalty call isn’t?
  14. Aye, not like this defence didn’t do a job against Spurs the weekend before last.
×
×
  • Create New...