It would be a good thing yes, it will ultimately limit how far the big boys can run into the distance as they are capped at a limit lower than revenue.
That being said, I’ve got no idea why the PL is so determined to make the league less competitive on the bigger stage. Ultimately such rules means you will never see an Mbappe grace these shores but PSG and Madrid would remain viable options.
It’s quite clear the owners are in full on protection mode without paying much attention to the bigger picture.
I’m no fan of Edwards but the moment you put a realistic release clause in a contract it’s bound to fuel speculation mind.
Especially when two players of roughly the same level in the same position went for the same money as the clause.
If we are prepared for Ashworth to rot, then the approach we take should be as mentioned before, every time Sir Jim opens his mouth the price goes up by another million. Let’s run it up.
They probably can to be fair, the big 6 FFP issues and ours aren’t really comparable because they have so much the new rules will further solidify that too.
In terms of FFP totally fine. They have massive revenues and that sweet harry Kane FFP margin.
For spurs, the issue has generally been the owners don’t spend up to the limit iirc.
Oh, I’ve read all those quotes from those firms before, on here as well I’m sure. I commented not long ago that populous keep pitching for the job
That being said, fair play I’m glad you found it worthwhile.
They are meant to be but they have players who they can offload for decent fees ESR probably being the prime candidate.
Also the new FFP rules are great for Arsenal when they come in.