jonny1403

What possible evidence do you have to suggest this?

People keep saying this but ignore the extra 3 points we gained from the West Ham game when we could easily have drawn/lost.

I'm not asking his view last summer. I'm asking whether Froggy thinks it was a good price now.

Wait - you don't think £65m was a good price for Isak?

fair

Why is Tino slated for a possible end of April return when he came off the bench in the last game?

One thing jumped out at me on the recent season ticket quote: This is mental - almost 15 years of the same price set under Ashley. Do supporters under that deal have the right to just keep renewing indefinitely?

Even if he was technically 'third choice striker' he'd get plenty of minutes assuming we get into Europe. Isak will pick up more knocks.

Because he’s injured…

Not even that but last season there was a period where it was universally accepted that he was the first name on the teamsheet behind Bruno due to his importance to the midfield. Yet even though it has been obvious he is playing with multiple injuries for almost an entire season this somehow gets completely ignored when he is being slated consistently as if the period of form last season didn't exist.

Hope people bear the above in mind when giving him dogs abuse every week.

Because we have three LBs (Burn will 100% play LB next season with new CBs coming in) and I don't think there's any guarantee Targett is sold either.

We aren’t signing a LB man

Best result for us that tbh - gives us more of a chance to get as many players back as possible and a minimum of 7 days between games until then.

Is Willock likely to be in the squad for this, even if he is managing an injury?