Scoot

But my point still stands. PIF are not going to rub anyone up the wrong way if they can get what they want whilst someone else does the dirty work for them, which it seems is exactly what's happening. We're only 2 and a half years into this and I personally think they're playing an absolute blinder.

We haven't needed to do and don't need to do it if somebody else is doing it for us (City). We can sit back and reap the benefits without having to do a thing.

If there is a legal challenge on RPT's from Man City, what's the chances rules are relaxed around RPT's before it even sees a courtroom? The Premier league must know its anti-competitive.

Look forward to seeing him back next season now.

Was thinking that. So basically they've both been talking to clubs from England and Europe as you would expect with the player out of contract in 2 months.

Bit aren't there still rules in place in regards to Related Party Sponsorship?

These made up addendances aren't exclusive to the 2nd half of this season.

No one expected today's vote to gain enough support, but it did...

That's what I mean, it's impossible to have both.

So how is that going to work? You can spend 5 times what the bottom club earn but only 75% of your turnover? It doesn't make sense!

But they aren't removing RPT's are they? The vote has nothing to do with that. Unless I'm mistaking.

Really hope it's not 1 of our utterly shite away performances. Been far too many of them this season for me to have any confidence in us on the road.

I agree. Full pre-season behind him and stay injury free and this lad will be an asset home and away going forward.