r0cafella

Indeed it can’t, whatever is decided we will have a lot of unhappy people mind.

I think we know expansion is possible, it’s just expensive for what we get and doesn’t resolve issues regarding lack of facilities/ opening new revenue streams.

Haha, personally I don’t think we will go for a Cm this summer, if we do though I’d imagine it’d because Bruno has gone.

Chelsea are meant to want 50m for him, paying that for what would be a squad player would obviously be madness. Let’s focus on resources on area we are more in need of.

The fact they did the same with Rice last year is probably why they feel so entitled.

Isn’t that what Tonali is?

Conor Gallagher could never replace what Bruno gives us.

For sure, I mean his piece is obviously a pre cursor to it and speculating regarding the outcome. I hope they publish the study so we can all draw our own conclusions as well.

Thanks for sharing but nothing which hasn’t been debated endlessly since on here.

It’s that time of year where the press pick random name and pick random number and put them in a sentence, I wouldn’t worry too much.

Paul Mitchell seems a good fit on the face of it. Only potential negative is the amount of jobs he’s had, could end up back in an Ashworth situation

Gallagher would be such a poor use of our limited resources.

This is obviously false, FFP is the great protector which stops clubs from going bust.

I think we need to make a distinction here; FMV is only a thing for related party transactions, anything which isn’t related party would be deemed FMV by default. So, although Fabinho was an overpay in my opinion, in actuality he went for his actual value which was what some mug was willing to pay. For ASM, his transfer with obviously influence by FMV, but with that being said, we didn’t get any better offers.

Me too, we need him to shine so can we cash in.