They probably can to be fair, the big 6 FFP issues and ours aren’t really comparable because they have so much the new rules will further solidify that too.
In terms of FFP totally fine. They have massive revenues and that sweet harry Kane FFP margin.
For spurs, the issue has generally been the owners don’t spend up to the limit iirc.
Oh, I’ve read all those quotes from those firms before, on here as well I’m sure. I commented not long ago that populous keep pitching for the job
That being said, fair play I’m glad you found it worthwhile.
They are meant to be but they have players who they can offload for decent fees ESR probably being the prime candidate.
Also the new FFP rules are great for Arsenal when they come in.
I think we know expansion is possible, it’s just expensive for what we get and doesn’t resolve issues regarding lack of facilities/ opening new revenue streams.
Chelsea are meant to want 50m for him, paying that for what would be a squad player would obviously be madness. Let’s focus on resources on area we are more in need of.
For sure, I mean his piece is obviously a pre cursor to it and speculating regarding the outcome.
I hope they publish the study so we can all draw our own conclusions as well.