Jump to content

BergenMagpie

Member
  • Posts

    1,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Id assume the clause is only triggered when paid up front as money we receive in the future is worth less than today due to inflation / reinvestment opportunities We would have to recognise all the revenues at the point of sale regardless if we would be paid up front or in installments
  2. Think its exactly the opposite as we would want the extra revenues. If we had sold Isak for 150m and bought two players for 50m each on 5 year deals we would be 130m + before having to deduct Isaks remaining costs It was what happened when Barcelona sold Arthur to Juventus and bought Pjanic from Juventus for basically the same fees
  3. Darwin apparently just deleted all the pictures of him in a liverpool kit from his instagram
  4. Must be the most misspelled player name on this forum
  5. Need to bump this in case anyone missed it Bruno is the only player I wouldnt sell for any price. Think the entire squad would get depressed if he was suddenly not around spreading joy
  6. Need another Isak goal with him celebrating by saying «Im staying forever» in sign language
  7. Deserved. Missed on the tactics today and Palace were dominating midfield. Still a pen though
  8. Was thinking that: Incorrect foul in a dangerous free kick area + complaint for yellow card = free kick stands + yellow card stands (No VAR) Offside penalty + career ending challenge (red card) = no penalty + no red card (VAR)
  9. They dont give yellow cards for complaining about referee decisions anymore, or have the sky 6 been immune all season? Think we must have picked up like 15 cards in the first quarter of the season for less than what Cucurella did just now
  10. 2m? Less than we paid Brighton? Someone should check on Ratcunts mental health at this point
  11. Perfect hattrick (left, right, header) in 29 mins? Must be some record
  12. Going to Man Utd for 89 mill in the first Dan Ashworth window
×
×
  • Create New...