Jump to content

Slim

Member
  • Posts

    10,939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Credit to Chelsea they have found some good loop holes for FFP recently.
  2. Seems strange that the punishment is less if you do it twice. Normal logic would be you get a harsher punishment.
  3. "And in another shock development, a vote to reverse the February ruling on related-party transactions - deals within multi-club networks or with sponsors who have the same owners as a club - could also be on the cards. In February, an amendment to these rules was approved by the narrowest of margins. With seven votes needed to block a proposal, there were 12 in favour, two abstentions and six against. But some feel that the change, and the knock-on impact it has on ownership of other clubs overseas, is harmful with one, thought to be Manchester City, considering legal action." Now we are cooking!
  4. Slim

    Loris Karius

    Bergamo is not really Milan.
  5. Slim

    Alexander Isak

    Yeah my point was can't believe anything on that site
  6. Would they not just let them off because it was not the new owners and they reported it to the premier?
  7. Slim

    Alexander Isak

    They said we are in race for Tony 😊
  8. They could just not vote for them
  9. What if we don't get Europe but sign good enough players to push for the top 4. Think you might be overestimating how much players care about the Europa League.
×
×
  • Create New...