Isaac Hayden: on loan at QPR

He's been much better than just 'decent'

I sai the signs are decent. He's been somewhere in between decent and good.

I think apart from the Huddersfield game he's been at least a 7/10 in pretty much every game and had some excellent games (Reading springs to mind)

I think apart from the Huddersfield game he's been at least a 7/10 in pretty much every game and had some excellent games (Reading springs to mind)

reading (I think, when he really pushed on) i agree. But I'd go more of a 6/10. Slightly better than average.

The bit on Steve Bruce is quite damning. Intense double sessions through the season man. No wonder his teams usually fade badly at the end. And yet he still persists with the same approach.

I think apart from the Huddersfield game he's been at least a 7/10 in pretty much every game and had some excellent games (Reading springs to mind)

reading (I think, when he really pushed on) i agree. But I'd go more of a 6/10. Slightly better than average.

6/10? 

He's been miles better than just slightly above average.  I'm not sure what madras expects our DM to be doing

 

He's been brilliant, especially considering the price.

The two games I have been to this season (QPR and Cardiff) he has looked class, one of our best players. Think he has loooked really good on the televised/periscope games, as well.

 

Great in the air, plays off both feet, moves the ball well and can stretch the play if needed. Not just a 5 yard, lay it off DM. Also has the physical ability to push on when needed. Not sure what madras thinks he can do a lot better?! 6/10

Someone get madras a prozac

Stand out player for both teams tonight.

 

I think he can make the jump up to the Premier League.

much improved from the weekend.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

What about all the games we've won when they've played together?

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

 

They are too similar imo.  We need to sign another midfielder who is willing to break into the opposition box more.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

 

They are too similar imo.  We need to sign another midfielder who is willing to break into the opposition box more.

 

Diame.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

 

They are too similar imo.  We need to sign another midfielder who is willing to break into the opposition box more.

 

Diame.

Aye I think we should try putting Diame and Shelvey in midfield and then try either two up top or buy a decent number 10

Hayden and Shelvey are absolutely fine together. We dominated the midfield by all accounts, if we lacked the cutting edge should probably look more at what the forwards produced on the day.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

 

They are too similar imo.  We need to sign another midfielder who is willing to break into the opposition box more.

 

Diame.

Aye I think we should try putting Diame and Shelvey in midfield and then try either two up top or buy a decent number 10

 

We should try this first.

The way we ended the game, but with Mitrovic for Murphy and Ritchie for Gouffran would be interesting.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

 

Don't agree

 

They are too similar imo.  We need to sign another midfielder who is willing to break into the opposition box more.

They aren't too similar but they don't seem to be complimentary either.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

Aye, it's not like we completely dominated the midfield for most of the game or anything

Some of the post match comments after a negative result are absolute aids sometimes.

Him and Shelvey can't play together.

Aye, it's not like we completely dominated the midfield for most of the game or anything

 

You can dominate midfield and still create little as there is no fucker from midfield trying to get into the box.  We need a CM next to shelvey who is prepared to get into the box.