Jump to content

Froggy

Member
  • Posts

    32,886
  • Joined

  1. It's the way it should be tbh. We've been so badly run we end up having to pay people for years after they leave. never seem to have any bargaining power whatsoever because of the stupid deals we put people on.
  2. Doesn't this go towards FFP though? I suggested in another thread you would spend heavily again in the summer, and other posters suggested you won't have much of a budget at all and that it will likely continue into subsequent windows. There's being rich and ruthless and there's being stupid. I still think a deal will be done in and around the £10m mark once the summer window closes.
  3. We approached them on the 1st of April. You've shared an article that says in the second paragraph we're yet to approach them. This deal was done very quickly.
  4. I think they reluctantly agreed an acceptable compensation fee. What do you mean by finally? This wasn't drawn out in the slightest. We only made the move for him at the start of April.
  5. No issues with City and Southampton for Berrada and Wilcox. Ashworth still in his garden...
  6. My entire point. you don't need to tell me how shit we are. But I read on here every week how the other team "should" be 4 and 5 up. That we "should" have lost but fluked a win. Or we "should" be behind because someone was offside when they shouldn't have been (the most hilarious one). PSG "should" have won. By a couple of goals at least. But they didn't. So did Newcastle deserve to go through due to defensive resilience or did they deserve to go out as they were massively outplayed throughout the 98 mins? The ask yourself, when we've been outplayed but kept a clean sheet and nicked a goal. Are we lucky, or defensively resilient and deserve to be where we are in the table?
  7. What do I get from using someone's bullshit against them? A lot. "Should" my arse.
  8. Oh I know. They "should" have been though right?
  9. Why not? You're the king of "shoulds." "Should be 4 to Bournemouth." "Man United should have lost because Solanke shouldn't have been offside." Well PSG absolutely battered you in that game (4.68xg - 1.40) They "should" have been 4-1 up. So should they have gone through or not?
×
×
  • Create New...