Jump to content

Rompe

Member
  • Posts

    472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I would hope we get "voted out" or they or we use literally any excuse to not join such a wretched and ridiculous competition.
  2. I don't know man, I don't think nation states should own football clubs abroad.
  3. Right, so I see the case is about the pricing of the player, and not the principle of transfers between two clubs with the same owner. Don't really see why they would come at the club from that angle though, how much would the price have to be to be unnaturally high when you see the other transfers to Saudi Arabia?
  4. None of those clubs are owned by the PIF/Saudi Arabia though.
  5. From Lorient to Bournemouth? What's the significance there?
  6. What dominance? And what has that got to do with Klopps point?
  7. Thanks to hugely inflated sponsorship deals they are yes. Not every club can have those.
  8. Liverpool spunked 35m on Carroll after selling Torres for 50m in the same window, Suarez cost them 7,5m and they sold him for like ten times that much to Barcelona. Of course they are spending money, but in terms of net spend they are nowhere near Manchester City who has won the Premier League 4 out of the 5 last seasons, and they will win this year too. Its complete domination and as I've already said it's not good for the game.
  9. I disagree, our owners wealth is in effect our wealth. The comparison between Newcastle and Liverpool is too soon to make, but it's only a matter of time until we become what Manchester City is now. Liverpool has put up a good fight in the last years, but Manchester City has been the dominant team and will continue to dominate, one reason for their dominance is that they can buy whomever they want without worry if it will work out. Take Kalvin Phillips for example, 42 million, what if he doesnt work out? Doesn't matter, they don't need to think about resale value or wages, in fact they can just buy another player in that position for an equal sum, or even more. No worries. That's a luxury that's not afforded to Liverpool.
  10. Yeah okay, but so what? There's always been differences in wealth, but in previous years clubs couldn't spend whatever they wanted to without possible concequences. It's impossible for the likes of PSG, Manchester City, and us too, to go bankrupt. It's literally endless amounts of money that can be spent without fear of "doing a Leeds" or whatever. It's not good for the game.
  11. Dont like Klopp, but he's got a point. 4 or 5 clubs having endless amounts of money to spend isn't good for the game.
  12. Mitro man, hope he can prove the doubters wrong this season
  13. Yeah, crazy how they got beat by City at the Etihad.
  14. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't just Abramovich facing sanctions right? It's quite a lot of the russian oligarchs no? So are the people who posts in "defense" of him (not defending him, but you know what I mean), against these sanctions in general or do they think he should be exempt because he owns Chelsea?
×
×
  • Create New...