timeEd32

We've already discussed this multiple times. In short, that's not true.

I don't think so because the specifics of their case can't really be replicated. The rules have evolved to prevent a good amount of what they did in the future, so Man City II would have been stopped or punished along the way. And, thus, they would not have become so big / successful, which is what has made this so messy.

Had a dream last night that Bruno left and I had to break the news to my son. If my dream is right then Bruno is off to Forest this summer.

He framed that more as Gallagher as a Longstaff replacement and Tonali would be the Bruno replacement. Not really a scenario I'm ready to think about though.

I don't know if he actually thought that or just assumed they'd be in it every year. Either way it seems clear that their 'plan' was predicated on Champions League revenue flowing in.

PSG xG 3.22 to 0.77xG for Dortmund 30 shots to 7 5 big chances to 1 70% possession Not too dissimilar from the night we were robbed.

What is our argument? That Australia is so far away it's basically behind closed doors?

I don't even want to put this game on. Watching two teams from our group at the scene of the crime... ugh.

That's easily the coolest race car I've ever seen.

Highly enjoyable pseudo match thread last night.

Sure, but there’s a big difference between top 4 and mid-table.

The post right above yours, written in the passive aggressive style that dominated the winter, is suggesting his job will be reviewed this summer and he has one more season to really prove himself.

Or if we hadn't thrown away the Liverpool game. Going to haunt me for the rest of time.

The good news for Man United is their next three opponents have only scored 219 goals this season.

That was always the problem though. Well run clubs sell a player a year or two early. Dumb ones buy them three years too late.