I thought the Chelsea - Arsenal game was fantastic. I wish the big four monopoly would end, but I have to say they produce great entertainment.
It was interesting that Arsenal kept on attacking after they went ahead, despite Andy Gray endlessly spouting the conventional wisdom about 'shutting up shop'. They looked likely to add to their lead, whereas Chelsea became more and more ragged.
I've often thought that this idea of funnelling back into defence to protect a lead is an over-rated tactic. Often, you see teams surrendering the initiative, and being unable to retain any possession, because they end up just clearing the ball to the opposition. I do wonder whether attack is a better option than caution, if only teams had the nerve to keep believing in it.