Author Topic: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II  (Read 924 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II
« Reply #25 on: Friday 13 April 2007, 09:11:02 AM »
For once I'm on Vic's side in an argument.
Quote
failure is like a disease to Kevin Keegan, one without a cure.

HTT on Kevin Keegan.  The glory days are back on N-O.  This is the sort of quality I look for in a forum.

Badly cluttered forums are a disease, HTT's the cure is what I say tbh.

Re: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II
« Reply #26 on: Friday 13 April 2007, 09:18:39 AM »
For once I'm on Vic's side in an argument.

....Vic jealous of me and Bluf mahoosive 9/11 threads intstalled in gold makes cheap follow up attempt. :lol:
"I'm a competitor and I want to play every game, every minute. The manager knows what I'm thinking. He knows I want to play. He makes his choices and I have to respect them."But it's true we don't share quite the same philosophy. For him, it's more crosses, a bit of a more direct style, whereas I'm more the kind of player who likes to play short passes.
"I like to pass and move.. .."That is the kind of football I like. That's the philosophy I learned at the French academy at Clairefontaine." HBA

Re: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II
« Reply #27 on: Friday 13 April 2007, 10:12:32 AM »
It was over by post 9 tbh  ;)

Invicta_Toon

Re: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II
« Reply #28 on: Friday 13 April 2007, 11:02:42 AM »
It was over by post 9 tbh  ;)

aye when you compared WTC7 to the fire in Manors, your case was pretty much over

Re: 9/11 Controlled demolition. Part II
« Reply #29 on: Friday 13 April 2007, 11:07:20 AM »
It was over by post 9 tbh  ;)

aye when you compared WTC7 to the fire in Manors, your case was pretty much over

Not arsed tbh.