Topic: Iran about to get f*cked

[Rebellious]

In order for the Britons to be released "every vested interest in Iran would need to be satisfied they had not deliberately entered Iranian waters, nor were they spying", the source added.

Stupid backward sand dwelling pricks. As if we were spying on their water in a f***ing tiny little boat. There are already spys over there surely anyway.

[Incognito]

In order for the Britons to be released "every vested interest in Iran would need to be satisfied they had not deliberately entered Iranian waters, nor were they spying", the source added.

Stupid backward sand dwelling pricks. As if we were spying on their water in a f***ing tiny little boat. There are already spys over there surely anyway.

Whats it got to do with South Shields?

[Rob W]

they're yemenis not persians anyway

[Parky]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

[Invicta_Toon]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

from 22,000 feet

[Parky]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

from 22,000 feet

 mackems.gif

[Rob W]

or higher - they have some serious weapons the Iranians - and of course the US Navy shot down an Airbus there a few years ago.............

[Parky]

or higher - they have some serious weapons the Iranians - and of course the US Navy shot down an Airbus there a few years ago.............

Russians still there training them on those new SAM's?

[Rob W]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

I think they have enough weaponry to THREATEN closure - and that's all it needs - the insurance companies will immediately withdraw marine cover on tankers and so they won't go there - Eye rak and Kuwait are buggered and the Saudis have to ship al their oil via Yanbu on the Red Sea - and it doesn't have the capacity so prices go sky high


Depends what Blair decides to do I guess...................   

[Parky]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

I think they have enough weaponry to THREATEN closure - and that's all it needs - the insurance companies will immediately withdraw marine cover on tankers and so they won't go there - Eye rak and Kuwait are buggered and the Saudis have to ship al their oil via Yanbu on the Red Sea - and it doesn't have the capacity so prices go sky high


Depends what Blair decides to do I guess...................   

...the old Silkworm is quite nasty too....

Bliar is probably looking at some sort of PR spin as we speak...

[Invicta_Toon]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

I think they have enough weaponry to THREATEN closure - and that's all it needs - the insurance companies will immediately withdraw marine cover on tankers and so they won't go there - Eye rak and Kuwait are buggered and the Saudis have to ship al their oil via Yanbu on the Red Sea - and it doesn't have the capacity so prices go sky high


Depends what Blair decides to do I guess...................   

right, so you don't see threatening closure of an international stretch of water as the necessary excuse for another coallition?

[Parky]

I can see it now - Bliar talks tough to Tehran and they say "Fine, we're closing the Straights to oil tankers - let see how your voters like petrol at £10 a litre............"

how would they do that then? is it not part of international waters?

Yes I'm quite curious about this too Rob....How you see it?

I think they have enough weaponry to THREATEN closure - and that's all it needs - the insurance companies will immediately withdraw marine cover on tankers and so they won't go there - Eye rak and Kuwait are buggered and the Saudis have to ship al their oil via Yanbu on the Red Sea - and it doesn't have the capacity so prices go sky high


Depends what Blair decides to do I guess...................   

right, so you don't see threatening closure of an international stretch of water as the necessary excuse for another coallition?

Vic you really think they've thought that through?

[Howaythelads]

Have we got any soldiers left to fight Iran?

a couple of hundred, the ones that aren't on remand

Conscription then. Would sort out some of you soft shites..... 

[Rob W]

But i've DONE my stretch - years ago...................... 

[Stubbs]

Iran have been goading the west for some time. This is just the latest instance and comes as no surprise.

I wonder what the appeasniks and apologists would say if Britain kidnapped a load of Iranian soldiers under dubious circumstances and then refused to release them?

 

[Howaythelads]

Iran have been goading the west for some time. This is just the latest instance and comes as no surprise.

I wonder what the appeasniks and apologists would say if Britain kidnapped a load of Iranian soldiers under dubious circumstances and then refused to release them?

 

Doubt they'd want to be released once they realised they were going to get a free house, a free car, free medical care and a weekly handout...... 

[Morph]

This is madness....

[Newcastle Fan]

Iran's Nuclear reactor is actually just 250 kilo's from my home

So if Iran are about to get f***ed,same goes for me..

[Invicta_Toon]

Iran's Nuclear reactor is actually just 250 kilo's from my home

So if Iran are about to get f***ed,same goes for me..

in the quiet words of the Virgin Mary:

"tough titties"





you'll be alright, just don't open any windows and don't breathe for a while

[madras]

Iran's Nuclear reactor is actually just 250 kilo's from my home

So if Iran are about to get f*****,same goes for me..

in the quiet words of the Virgin Mary:

"tough titties"





you'll be alright, just don't open any windows and don't breathe for a while

always thought it was mother teresa that coined that

[Newcastle Fan]

Not really botherd tbh,they taught us back in the iraq war how to handle ourselfs in case of a nuclear attack/threat..























"Hide under your desk.."

[BlueStar]

Duck and cover, you'll be fine

[biggs]

Tony Blair:

"they need to be released very soon, or this will enter a different phase"

 

According to 5 Live government insiders say this means instead of negotiating privately it'll become a public war of words.  The expert they had on claims military action is out of the question for the moment because we don't have enough of a military presence in the area as so many troops are tied up.  Ms Rice and co are refusing to comment and back us because they don't want the Iranians to ask for their guys the US captured in Iraq as a trade.

typical yanks dont give a fook about anyone but themselves

[bulivye]

Tony Blair:

"they need to be released very soon, or this will enter a different phase"

 

According to 5 Live government insiders say this means instead of negotiating privately it'll become a public war of words.  The expert they had on claims military action is out of the question for the moment because we don't have enough of a military presence in the area as so many troops are tied up.  Ms Rice and co are refusing to comment and back us because they don't want the Iranians to ask for their guys the US captured in Iraq as a trade.

typical yanks dont give a fook about anyone but themselves

well, it may be cold comfort, but i care about all of you!

anyway,  i think condi & frineds are nervous as long-tailed cats in a roomful of rocking chairs about this even though they're trying to play it cool.  the US military is stretched too thin to allow them to rattle their sabres too loudly.

[CaliMag]

Airstrikes have always been the solution for Iran... never invasion.

If they try to blockade the gulf then the sh!t would really happen.