Author Topic: £100m  (Read 7461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: £100m
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:22:38 PM »
Forgot about Owen, again  :lol:

Am sure he's bothered about that  :lol:

Re: £100m
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:24:31 PM »
Forgot about Owen, again  :lol:

Am sure he's bothered about that  :lol:

Second time I have done it in the last couple of weeks I think, £16m and I can't even remember the bugger  bluesigh.gif bluesigh.gif
Acceptance level adequate.

Re: £100m
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:25:40 PM »
Whole new defence, with back ups - 40 Million
Hargreaves - 14 Million
Malouda (to play on the right) - 13 Million
Darren Bent - 8 Million
Huntelaar - 12 Million
Kevin Doyle - 5 Million

8 Million left over to tempt a top-class manager.
 

Re: £100m
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:25:48 PM »
Forgot about Owen, again  :lol:

Am sure he's bothered about that  :lol:

Second time I have done it in the last couple of weeks I think, £16m and I can't even remember the bugger  bluesigh.gif bluesigh.gif

10 games in your 1st two seasons at a new club will do that to you.

Although just check our bank balance and you'd soon remember we signed him.

Not his fault i know, but FFS, its something i'd actually rather forget about tbh.

Re: £100m
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:31:47 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

Re: £100m
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:46:19 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

Go on then, give us your £100m! That team has quality all the way through. Don't forget when Chelsea spent their millions they already some almost world class players in their squad in Terry and Lampard!
Acceptance level adequate.

Howaythelads

  • Clueless
Re: £100m
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:46:26 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

                             Krul

R. Taylor    S. Taylor    Ferdinand  M. Taylor

Milner         Parker       Emre            Duff

                  Bent          Owen

Not being funny, but  £100m and you'd still want to see Parker and Emre in the middle?  bluelaugh.gif bluelaugh.gif Sorry, mate. Honest. That's me off for a can.

Howaythelads

  • Clueless
Re: £100m
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:46:54 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

I agree. It looks s**** to me, tbh.

Re: £100m
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:50:37 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

I agree. It looks s**** to me, tbh.

Well given the fact that you left it at, "i will give it to Wenger" does your opinion really count?
Acceptance level adequate.

Howaythelads

  • Clueless
Re: £100m
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:52:44 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

I agree. It looks s**** to me, tbh.

Well given the fact that you left it at, "i will give it to Wenger" does your opinion really count?

Surely you of all people aren't taking the stance that your opinion is worth more than mine because I'm 48 and you're 12?

Re: £100m
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 09:58:59 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

I agree. It looks s**** to me, tbh.

Well given the fact that you left it at, "i will give it to Wenger" does your opinion really count?

Surely you of all people aren't taking the stance that your opinion is worth more than mine because I'm 48 and you're 12?

 :lol:

Ok whats wrong with that team? Two fantastic young full backs who will only get better. Top class centre back with a very good youngster beside him who will also get better. Young, pacy wingers who are very capable to destroying defences, top class defensive midfielder alongside a midfielder who scores more than his fair share in a pretty average Everton Side. Young english striker who has always been good for a good is excellent in the air, has good hold up play and works his arse off and a lightening quick partner who is very two footed is settling into the premiership and starting to look a very good player. I also forgot to put Owen in there who will score goals when fit.

If you want to leave your answer as is (ie complete kop out!) and then need to result to things like "but you're 12 years old" then fine but you do look a bit of a tit when questioning other peoples comments.
Acceptance level adequate.

MagicNumber9

Re: £100m
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:18:23 PM »
David Villa - 100m ;)

Morph

Re: £100m
« Reply #37 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:19:21 PM »
Someone really big and rich and everyfin injects us with cash and we've got a £100m transfer budget for FM 2007.

Go wild. What do you do?

 :winking:

Howaythelads

  • Clueless
Re: £100m
« Reply #38 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:19:56 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

With £100 Mill to spend you'd expect to be challenging the title, could you see that team challenging? i personally couldnt!

I agree. It looks s**** to me, tbh.

Well given the fact that you left it at, "i will give it to Wenger" does your opinion really count?

Surely you of all people aren't taking the stance that your opinion is worth more than mine because I'm 48 and you're 12?

 :lol:

Ok whats wrong with that team? Two fantastic young full backs who will only get better. Top class centre back with a very good youngster beside him who will also get better. Young, pacy wingers who are very capable to destroying defences, top class defensive midfielder alongside a midfielder who scores more than his fair share in a pretty average Everton Side. Young english striker who has always been good for a good is excellent in the air, has good hold up play and works his arse off and a lightening quick partner who is very two footed is settling into the premiership and starting to look a very good player. I also forgot to put Owen in there who will score goals when fit.

If you want to leave your answer as is (ie complete kop out!) and then need to result to things like "but you're 12 years old" then fine but you do look a bit of a tit when questioning other peoples comments.

I thought you were the tit actually when you said "does your opinion really count".

Cheers

Re: £100m
« Reply #39 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:23:50 PM »
You have a go at other people for ignoring parts of your posts  :lol:

Well done old man, coming across as mature as ever.
Acceptance level adequate.

Nate

  • Global Moderator
Re: £100m
« Reply #40 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:29:53 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

                             Krul

R. Taylor    S. Taylor    Ferdinand  M. Taylor

Milner         Parker       Emre            Duff

                  Bent          Owen

Not being funny, but  £100m and you'd still want to see Parker and Emre in the middle?  bluelaugh.gif bluelaugh.gif Sorry, mate. Honest. That's me off for a can.

 :lol:

I would go along with spending however much it takes to attract a world class manager, players are relatively unimportant in comparison.

Re: £100m
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:37:10 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

                             Krul

R. Taylor    S. Taylor    Ferdinand  M. Taylor

Milner         Parker       Emre            Duff

                  Bent          Owen

Not being funny, but  £100m and you'd still want to see Parker and Emre in the middle?  bluelaugh.gif bluelaugh.gif Sorry, mate. Honest. That's me off for a can.

Jesus christ cant you read, he was talking about a canny bench, i put up the other players, surely even you can see that?  :roll:

Or do you think i'd start Krul over Given, which would of been the most obvious thing to have a go at.  :roll: :roll: :roll:

Howaythelads

  • Clueless
Re: £100m
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 10:44:12 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

                             Krul

R. Taylor    S. Taylor    Ferdinand  M. Taylor

Milner         Parker       Emre            Duff

                  Bent          Owen

Not being funny, but  £100m and you'd still want to see Parker and Emre in the middle?  bluelaugh.gif bluelaugh.gif Sorry, mate. Honest. That's me off for a can.

Jesus christ cant you read, he was talking about a canny bench, i put up the other players, surely even you can see that?  :roll:

Or do you think i'd start Krul over Given, which would of been the most obvious thing to have a go at.  :roll: :roll: :roll:

You might, like.

Re: £100m
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday 19 December 2006, 11:03:17 PM »
                        Given

Richards   Woodgate     Davies     Baines

SWP         Cahill       Hargreaves    N'Zogbia

                  Martins     Ashton


Swapped Barton for Cahill but that doesnt look too bad and the bench would be pretty impressive also.

                             Krul

R. Taylor    S. Taylor    Ferdinand  M. Taylor

Milner         Parker       Emre            Duff

                  Bent          Owen

Not being funny, but  £100m and you'd still want to see Parker and Emre in the middle?  bluelaugh.gif bluelaugh.gif Sorry, mate. Honest. That's me off for a can.

Jesus christ cant you read, he was talking about a canny bench, i put up the other players, surely even you can see that?  :roll:

Or do you think i'd start Krul over Given, which would of been the most obvious thing to have a go at.  :roll: :roll: :roll:

You might, like.

Okaaay... eekout.gif

Optimistic Nut

  • Global Moderator
  • El Traductor
Re: £100m
« Reply #44 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 01:08:32 AM »

Curtis Davies - £6m

Anton Ferdinand - £8m



£14m on a defensive partnership not that much (if at all) better than what we have?!  :lol:

Re: £100m
« Reply #45 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 11:08:37 AM »

Curtis Davies - £6m

Anton Ferdinand - £8m



£14m on a defensive partnership not that much (if at all) better than what we have?!  :lol:

Your opinion, shared by you and a peanut.

Re: £100m
« Reply #46 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 11:14:45 AM »
Buy a team in the french league and employ a decent manager. Buy a team in the dutch league and employ a decent manager.
Use both teams as feeder clubs to nourish Newcastle united and with the 1 million left over I would invite the whole of st james park to 10 pints or so the day we win a cup...
*The pessimist borrows trouble; the optimist lends encouragement.
*Act as if it were impossible to fail.
*The average pencil is seven inches long, with just a half-inch eraser - in case you thought optimism was dead.

Re: £100m
« Reply #47 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 11:16:34 AM »
Get rid of:

Carr
Bramble
Babayaro
Bernard
Parker
Ameobi

IN:

Paolo Ferreira - £7m
Wes Brown - £4m
Jonathan Woodgate - £5m
Wayne Bridge - £4m
Leighton Baines - £6m

Shaun Wright-Phillips - £10m
Owen Hargreaves - £14m
Kevin Nolan - £11m

Darren Bent - £9m
Fernando Torres - £30m


Given

Ferreira --- Woodgate --- Brown --- Bridge

SWP --- Nolan --- Hargreaves --- N'Zogbia

Owen --- Torres


Harper

Solano --- Taylor --- Ramage --- Baines

Milner --- Emre --- Diarra --- Duff

Martins --- Bent

Re: £100m
« Reply #48 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 12:09:51 PM »
Ramage and Taylor would get a LOT of games there  bluebiggrin.gif
Acceptance level adequate.

Re: £100m
« Reply #49 on: Wednesday 20 December 2006, 12:15:29 PM »
Ramage and Taylor would get a LOT of games there bluebiggrin.gif

That was the idea. Brown and Woodgate are both class but they won't make Taylor and Ramage fizzle out of the team. :thup: